[文法] 這句的文法應該如何分析?

看板Eng-Class作者 (哇哈哈)時間15年前 (2010/08/04 20:23), 編輯推噓0(0010)
留言10則, 4人參與, 最新討論串1/1
出處:八月份Studio Classroom Novara was probably the first person Copernicus had ever met who dared to challenge the 1,400-year-old conclusions of taht era's paramount astronomer: Ptolemy. 以下是我的問題: Novara was probably (the first person) Copernicus had ever met who dared 先行詞  ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄(1) ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ ̄ to challenge the 1,400-year-old conclusions of taht era's paramount astronomer: Ptolemy. 標示(1)的部份,前面應該是省略了whom,在修飾the first person, 但讓我困惑的是後面who dared to... Ptolemy.這句, 它也是關係子句,但是它的先行詞也是the first person嗎? 同一個先行詞可以同時使用兩個關係子句修飾它嗎? 麻煩高手提點一下, 我想好久,腦筋都快打結了@@ 謝謝大家!! <(_ _)> -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 114.36.201.190

08/04 21:29, , 1F
是的,可以。
08/04 21:29, 1F

08/04 21:52, , 2F
這就好像你懂得把"the first person"當成單一element來看
08/04 21:52, 2F

08/04 21:53, , 3F
你可以把你標的 ((...)-(1)-) 也當成單一整體來看,之後的
08/04 21:53, 3F

08/04 21:54, , 4F
who dare ...(和前頭的(whom) Copr...met) 就像是前頭的
08/04 21:54, 4F

08/04 21:54, , 5F
"the first"一樣是加以說明是怎樣的"person",差別只是當
08/04 21:54, 5F

08/04 21:55, , 6F
需要說明的內容很長很複雜時 用關代子句來說明而已
08/04 21:55, 6F

08/04 21:55, , 7F
(Note: 像這樣的表達法很常見)
08/04 21:55, 7F

08/04 22:33, , 8F
嗯,I see. 謝謝兩位^^
08/04 22:33, 8F

08/04 23:37, , 9F
如果用分詞片語+主詞+關代會不會更好?
08/04 23:37, 9F

08/05 08:11, , 10F
回樓上,以這一句來講,會更爛
08/05 08:11, 10F
文章代碼(AID): #1CMLlPSV (Eng-Class)