[文法]比較級

看板Eng-Class作者 (唯)時間15年前 (2010/06/11 16:04), 編輯推噓9(9推 0噓 36→)
留言45則, 6人參與, 最新討論串1/1
1. The less you worry, the happier you are. 2. The more you eat, the easier you will get fat. 3. The more you learn things, the more you know things. 這幾句比較級都有錯 可以麻煩幫我改錯嗎? -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 111.255.47.198
推
06/11 16:23, , 1F
worry about
06/11 16:23, 1F
→
06/11 16:23, , 2F
the more easily
06/11 16:23, 2F
→
06/11 16:24, , 3F
刪things
06/11 16:24, 3F
推
06/11 17:02, , 4F
easier是可以接受的....
06/11 17:02, 4F
→
06/11 17:04, , 5F
The more things you learn, the more things you know
06/11 17:04, 5F
→
06/11 17:34, , 6F
The more things yo learn the more things you forget
06/11 17:34, 6F
推
06/11 18:22, , 7F
請問R大easy可以當副詞嗎..我記得應該是easily
06/11 18:22, 7F
→
06/11 18:42, , 8F
the easier you will get fat,這句怎麼怪怪的.
06/11 18:42, 8F
→
06/11 22:21, , 9F
take it easy;easier said than done; easy come, easy go
06/11 22:21, 9F
→
06/11 22:21, , 10F
conclusion: yes, easy can be used as an adverb
06/11 22:21, 10F
推
06/11 22:39, , 11F
Z大舉的都是特例...那請問
06/11 22:39, 11F
→
06/11 22:40, , 12F
能不能說: I did it easy. We beat them easy.
06/11 22:40, 12F
→
06/11 22:41, , 13F
He found it easy. 可以嗎/
06/11 22:41, 13F
→
06/11 22:42, , 14F
再看原題目: You will get fat easy (or easily?)
06/11 22:42, 14F
推
06/11 22:45, , 15F
easy當副詞時,是用在特殊片語裡..但不能套用在所有句子上吧
06/11 22:45, 15F
→
06/11 22:55, , 16F
我的結論是，他可以當副詞，誰說他能套用所有句子上
06/11 22:55, 16F
→
06/11 22:55, , 17F
你的問題不是問"請問R大easy可以當副詞嗎"
06/11 22:55, 17F
→
06/11 22:59, , 18F
"能不能說:....可以嗎/" -> 你舉的剛好都是適合口語的場合
06/11 22:59, 18F
→
06/11 22:59, , 19F
06/11 22:59, 19F
→
06/11 22:59, , 20F
http://ppt.cc/;IeY 這個其實有提到:
06/11 22:59, 20F
→
06/11 23:00, , 21F
06/11 23:00, 21F
→
06/11 23:00, , 22F
->(RHD) 找 adv -> "Informal"
06/11 23:00, 22F
→
06/11 23:00, , 23F
我個人的看法是原題目出得不好，因為"The more ..."的使
06/11 23:00, 23F
→
06/11 23:00, , 24F
用場合並不是只限於至正式場合，且2. 內容提的是很日常的
06/11 23:00, 24F
→
06/11 23:00, , 25F
東西
06/11 23:00, 25F
推
06/11 23:12, , 26F
抱歉 我誤會了
06/11 23:12, 26F
推
06/11 23:38, , 27F
如果是單純副詞的話 easily比較常用 但是比較級的時候
06/11 23:38, 27F
→
06/11 23:40, , 28F
easier使用的比例就增加了... 如果是我的話 對於單純的副
06/11 23:40, 28F
→
06/11 23:40, , 29F
詞我也喜歡用easily而非easy
06/11 23:40, 29F
→
06/11 23:41, , 30F
我曾問過一個英國朋友為什麼會有這樣的現象 結果她說不然
06/11 23:41, 30F
→
06/11 23:42, , 31F
er結尾的比較級在副詞中不就用不上了嗎?? 這個解釋有點牽
06/11 23:42, 31F
→
06/11 23:43, , 32F
強 不過反過來看可能也顯示了副詞的ly只有顯示詞性的功用
06/11 23:43, 32F
→
06/11 23:44, , 33F
在比較級的時候不妨回到形容詞的樣態比較沒有負擔
06/11 23:44, 33F
推
06/11 23:50, , 34F
看不懂樓上說的...
06/11 23:50, 34F
→
06/11 23:51, , 35F
easy 是形容詞, easier 是比較級
06/11 23:51, 35F
→
06/11 23:51, , 36F
easily 是副詞, more easily 是比較級
06/11 23:51, 36F
→
06/11 23:52, , 37F
什麼時候 easier 可以當 easily 的比較級了????
06/11 23:52, 37F
推
06/11 23:59, , 38F
我的意思是 因為原則上副詞都是兩個音節以上的 照道理要
06/11 23:59, 38F
→
06/12 00:02, , 39F
全部加more 不過會加more的原因是因為避免er結尾音節太多
06/12 00:02, 39F
→
06/12 00:03, , 40F
讓人聽不出比較級 但是在easily這樣的情形 對我們來說其
06/12 00:03, 40F
→
06/12 00:05, , 41F
實它字面要傳達的就是easy的意思(只不過它是副詞) 所以用
06/12 00:05, 41F
→
06/12 00:06, , 42F
easier反而較more easily沒有負擔 more easily反而會讓人
06/12 00:06, 42F
→
06/12 00:07, , 43F
聯想起 more easy這樣多此一舉的情況 當然我的解釋並沒向
06/12 00:07, 43F
→
06/12 00:09, , 44F
更多人求證過 但是在第二板的side by side第二冊有提到這
06/12 00:09, 44F
→
06/12 00:09, , 45F
樣的用法~~
06/12 00:09, 45F
‣ 更多 yyuweii 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1C4Utumb (Eng-Class)