[討論] 我們球隊還要繼續派球員出征支持棒協嗎?
看到隔壁板的新聞有感而發
這邊先不談政治圈的事,但就球迷的角度而言,我們是否該出聲表達「在棒協改組之前強
烈不支持兄弟球團派出任何球員參加棒協主導的國際賽」?
就是有職業球團的支持棒協才能一直到現在還是這副德性,Lamigo這次做出了很好的示範
,不出人就是不出人,那我們球隊為何還要讓球員打棒協主導的國際賽?
長痛不如短痛,我們也知道球員一定很想為國爭光代表國家隊出征,但是如果現在球團們
合作抵制棒協,也許要撐個幾次國際賽不出球員,一旦成功了就能換來往後所有一級國際
賽的主導權,我相信還是值得的
我不清楚中信兄弟的高層怎麼想,但球迷有表達自己意見的權利,如果大家團結起來人數
夠多高層勢必也要做出回應,訴求很簡單就是兩點:1.棒協改組 2.由中職主導一級國際
賽
大家怎樣看?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.218.150.93
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Elephants/M.1489156581.A.2F9.html
推
03/10 22:37, , 1F
03/10 22:37, 1F
吳志揚說了什麼?
→
03/10 22:40, , 2F
03/10 22:40, 2F
推
03/10 22:40, , 3F
03/10 22:40, 3F
推
03/10 22:40, , 4F
03/10 22:40, 4F
推
03/10 22:42, , 5F
03/10 22:42, 5F
→
03/10 22:42, , 6F
03/10 22:42, 6F
球隊最需要的還是球迷,怎麼敢不理會球迷的聲音?
如果政府沒辦法處理棒協,那球團就該肩負起抵制的責任,而不是放給它爛最後苦的還是
球員和球迷
推
03/10 22:43, , 7F
03/10 22:43, 7F
推
03/10 22:44, , 8F
03/10 22:44, 8F
→
03/10 22:44, , 9F
03/10 22:44, 9F
推
03/10 22:45, , 10F
03/10 22:45, 10F
推
03/10 22:46, , 11F
03/10 22:46, 11F
→
03/10 22:46, , 12F
03/10 22:46, 12F
你怎麼會期待檯面上那些政x真的會對棒協動刀...
推
03/10 22:47, , 13F
03/10 22:47, 13F
推
03/10 22:48, , 14F
03/10 22:48, 14F
→
03/10 22:48, , 15F
03/10 22:48, 15F
→
03/10 22:48, , 16F
03/10 22:48, 16F
推
03/10 22:48, , 17F
03/10 22:48, 17F
→
03/10 22:49, , 18F
03/10 22:49, 18F
推
03/10 22:51, , 19F
03/10 22:51, 19F
推
03/10 22:52, , 20F
03/10 22:52, 20F
→
03/10 22:52, , 21F
03/10 22:52, 21F
推
03/10 22:52, , 22F
03/10 22:52, 22F
推
03/10 22:53, , 23F
03/10 22:53, 23F
推
03/10 22:54, , 24F
03/10 22:54, 24F
推
03/10 22:58, , 25F
03/10 22:58, 25F
推
03/10 22:58, , 26F
03/10 22:58, 26F
→
03/10 22:58, , 27F
03/10 22:58, 27F
→
03/10 23:00, , 28F
03/10 23:00, 28F
→
03/10 23:00, , 29F
03/10 23:00, 29F
→
03/10 23:00, , 30F
03/10 23:00, 30F
→
03/10 23:00, , 31F
03/10 23:00, 31F
→
03/10 23:00, , 32F
03/10 23:00, 32F
推
03/10 23:04, , 33F
03/10 23:04, 33F
推
03/10 23:05, , 34F
03/10 23:05, 34F
推
03/10 23:07, , 35F
03/10 23:07, 35F
推
03/10 23:13, , 36F
03/10 23:13, 36F
還有 79 則推文
還有 3 段內文
推
03/11 01:56, , 116F
03/11 01:56, 116F
→
03/11 01:56, , 117F
03/11 01:56, 117F
→
03/11 01:57, , 118F
03/11 01:57, 118F
→
03/11 01:58, , 119F
03/11 01:58, 119F
→
03/11 01:58, , 120F
03/11 01:58, 120F
→
03/11 01:59, , 121F
03/11 01:59, 121F
推
03/11 02:08, , 122F
03/11 02:08, 122F
推
03/11 02:17, , 123F
03/11 02:17, 123F
→
03/11 02:17, , 124F
03/11 02:17, 124F
推
03/11 03:12, , 125F
03/11 03:12, 125F
推
03/11 09:42, , 126F
03/11 09:42, 126F
→
03/11 09:42, , 127F
03/11 09:42, 127F
→
03/11 09:42, , 128F
03/11 09:42, 128F
→
03/11 09:42, , 129F
03/11 09:42, 129F
推
03/11 09:48, , 130F
03/11 09:48, 130F
→
03/11 09:52, , 131F
03/11 09:52, 131F
推
03/11 10:17, , 132F
03/11 10:17, 132F
噓
03/11 10:18, , 133F
03/11 10:18, 133F
→
03/11 10:18, , 134F
03/11 10:18, 134F
→
03/11 11:04, , 135F
03/11 11:04, 135F
推
03/11 12:00, , 136F
03/11 12:00, 136F
→
03/11 12:00, , 137F
03/11 12:00, 137F
推
03/11 13:35, , 138F
03/11 13:35, 138F
→
03/11 13:35, , 139F
03/11 13:35, 139F
推
03/11 17:30, , 140F
03/11 17:30, 140F
→
03/11 17:30, , 141F
03/11 17:30, 141F
→
03/11 17:30, , 142F
03/11 17:30, 142F
推
03/11 20:19, , 143F
03/11 20:19, 143F
→
03/11 20:19, , 144F
03/11 20:19, 144F
推
03/11 22:45, , 145F
03/11 22:45, 145F
推
03/12 02:08, , 146F
03/12 02:08, 146F
→
03/12 02:08, , 147F
03/12 02:08, 147F
→
03/12 02:08, , 148F
03/12 02:08, 148F
推
03/12 02:10, , 149F
03/12 02:10, 149F
→
03/12 02:10, , 150F
03/12 02:10, 150F
→
03/12 02:10, , 151F
03/12 02:10, 151F
推
03/12 14:44, , 152F
03/12 14:44, 152F
→
03/12 14:45, , 153F
03/12 14:45, 153F
→
03/13 10:56, , 154F
03/13 10:56, 154F
推
03/14 16:16, , 155F
03/14 16:16, 155F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 5 篇):