[討論] 大家覺得高層會主動「拆掉」雙洋砲嗎?已回收
最近幾場兄弟投手都壓不住對方打線
無論是先發還是中繼
雖然雙洋砲威力加成好用,但當洋投先發時,只能上一個洋將
又雙洋砲輪流受傷,能同時上場的次數又減低
現在有種感覺,兄弟下半季可能會採取雙洋投+一洋砲模式
很可能就是佩卓去打DH吧?(有鑑於他的傷勢)
然後請兩個強力SP洋投
這樣佩卓既可以場場上場,又有強力洋投封鎖對方打線
兄弟現在團隊打擊率僅次於Lamigo,投手ERA卻是四隊之末
兄弟 義大 桃猿 統一
打擊率 0.305 0.298 0.309 0.291
防禦率 5.81 5.16 4.95 4.23
不知草總怎麼想?
光有打擊能力,但投手無法壓制,是很難一直贏下去的
真的開始擔心雙洋砲會不會拆掉,希望不要
不然希望聯盟能改成恰恰那個建議
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 180.176.16.13
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Elephants/M.1430571000.A.937.html
推
05/02 20:50, , 1F
05/02 20:50, 1F
推
05/02 20:50, , 2F
05/02 20:50, 2F
→
05/02 20:50, , 3F
05/02 20:50, 3F
→
05/02 20:50, , 4F
05/02 20:50, 4F
推
05/02 20:50, , 5F
05/02 20:50, 5F
推
05/02 20:51, , 6F
05/02 20:51, 6F
推
05/02 20:51, , 7F
05/02 20:51, 7F
→
05/02 20:51, , 8F
05/02 20:51, 8F
→
05/02 20:51, , 9F
05/02 20:51, 9F
推
05/02 20:51, , 10F
05/02 20:51, 10F
推
05/02 20:51, , 11F
05/02 20:51, 11F
→
05/02 20:51, , 12F
05/02 20:51, 12F
→
05/02 20:51, , 13F
05/02 20:51, 13F
→
05/02 20:51, , 14F
05/02 20:51, 14F
推
05/02 20:52, , 15F
05/02 20:52, 15F
推
05/02 20:52, , 16F
05/02 20:52, 16F
推
05/02 20:52, , 17F
05/02 20:52, 17F
→
05/02 20:52, , 18F
05/02 20:52, 18F
→
05/02 20:52, , 19F
05/02 20:52, 19F
推
05/02 20:52, , 20F
05/02 20:52, 20F
推
05/02 20:52, , 21F
05/02 20:52, 21F
推
05/02 20:52, , 22F
05/02 20:52, 22F
推
05/02 20:53, , 23F
05/02 20:53, 23F
→
05/02 20:53, , 24F
05/02 20:53, 24F
→
05/02 20:53, , 25F
05/02 20:53, 25F
推
05/02 20:54, , 26F
05/02 20:54, 26F
→
05/02 20:54, , 27F
05/02 20:54, 27F
推
05/02 20:54, , 28F
05/02 20:54, 28F
推
05/02 20:55, , 29F
05/02 20:55, 29F
→
05/02 20:55, , 30F
05/02 20:55, 30F
→
05/02 20:55, , 31F
05/02 20:55, 31F
→
05/02 20:55, , 32F
05/02 20:55, 32F
→
05/02 20:55, , 33F
05/02 20:55, 33F
→
05/02 20:55, , 34F
05/02 20:55, 34F
→
05/02 20:56, , 35F
05/02 20:56, 35F
→
05/02 20:56, , 36F
05/02 20:56, 36F
→
05/02 20:57, , 37F
05/02 20:57, 37F
→
05/02 20:57, , 38F
05/02 20:57, 38F
→
05/02 20:57, , 39F
05/02 20:57, 39F
→
05/02 20:57, , 40F
05/02 20:57, 40F
→
05/02 20:58, , 41F
05/02 20:58, 41F
→
05/02 20:59, , 42F
05/02 20:59, 42F
→
05/02 20:59, , 43F
05/02 20:59, 43F
→
05/02 21:00, , 44F
05/02 21:00, 44F
→
05/02 21:00, , 45F
05/02 21:00, 45F
→
05/02 21:00, , 46F
05/02 21:00, 46F
推
05/02 21:01, , 47F
05/02 21:01, 47F
→
05/02 21:01, , 48F
05/02 21:01, 48F
→
05/02 21:03, , 49F
05/02 21:03, 49F
推
05/02 21:05, , 50F
05/02 21:05, 50F
→
05/02 21:06, , 51F
05/02 21:06, 51F
→
05/02 21:13, , 52F
05/02 21:13, 52F
→
05/02 21:15, , 53F
05/02 21:15, 53F
→
05/02 21:16, , 54F
05/02 21:16, 54F
→
05/02 21:16, , 55F
05/02 21:16, 55F
推
05/02 21:38, , 56F
05/02 21:38, 56F
推
05/02 22:20, , 57F
05/02 22:20, 57F
推
05/02 23:06, , 58F
05/02 23:06, 58F
推
05/02 23:41, , 59F
05/02 23:41, 59F
→
05/02 23:41, , 60F
05/02 23:41, 60F
推
05/02 23:53, , 61F
05/02 23:53, 61F
→
05/02 23:53, , 62F
05/02 23:53, 62F
→
05/02 23:53, , 63F
05/02 23:53, 63F
→
05/02 23:53, , 64F
05/02 23:53, 64F
→
05/02 23:53, , 65F
05/02 23:53, 65F
→
05/02 23:53, , 66F
05/02 23:53, 66F
→
05/02 23:53, , 67F
05/02 23:53, 67F
→
05/02 23:53, , 68F
05/02 23:53, 68F
推
05/03 00:07, , 69F
05/03 00:07, 69F
推
05/03 00:09, , 70F
05/03 00:09, 70F
→
05/03 00:11, , 71F
05/03 00:11, 71F
推
05/03 04:06, , 72F
05/03 04:06, 72F
→
05/03 04:06, , 73F
05/03 04:06, 73F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):