Re: [請益] 機會成本的問題

看板Economics作者 (烈日秋霜ψ(._.)>)時間16年前 (2008/07/05 11:59), 編輯推噓1(100)
留言1則, 1人參與, 最新討論串2/3 (看更多)
※ 引述《bbc (烈日秋霜ψ(._.)>)》之銘言: : 我已經爬過文了, : 不過還是有問題所以請大家指教一下。 : 國中公民中有一題 : 放棄月薪3萬的工作,出國留學學費5萬, : 如果照之前文章的解釋,機會成本應該是3萬+5萬=8萬。 : 那今天如果有二個水果,我買APPLE花了5元,沒買3元的梨子, : 機會成本為何會是3元的梨子,而不是3+5元? : Addison Wesly Longman的書中寫著 : The highest-value alternative forgone in making choice. For example, if student who goes skiing would otherwise have spent the weekend working at a part-time job, an implict cost of skiing is the income that would otherise have been earned, if working is the high-valued alternative. Therefore, the full economic cost of the ski weekend- the opportunity cost -equals the explict money(that money does have an alternative use) plus the implict costs of forgone income. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc) ◆ From: 118.167.70.86

07/05 12:06, , 1F
這兩個定義根本就是不同的兩回事.那只好猜囉
07/05 12:06, 1F
文章代碼(AID): #18Rl6uuu (Economics)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #18Rl6uuu (Economics)