Re: [假設] 沒有張憲義事件發生的話
如果從我個人的觀點來看
美國應該就是因為有滲透、掌握 才讓台灣做到那種地步
然後決定一夕之間灑網捕魚
不要忘記美國把張接回去
這條線以後就再也不能用了
所以成本其實並不低
所以 就算沒有張憲義
也會有類似的人物
因為要發展核武實在有太多蛛絲馬跡可搜尋了
美國應該很早就注意到台灣想要自己偷搞了吧
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 175.180.112.57
推
03/16 00:45, , 1F
03/16 00:45, 1F
推
03/16 00:46, , 2F
03/16 00:46, 2F
→
03/16 00:47, , 3F
03/16 00:47, 3F
→
03/16 00:47, , 4F
03/16 00:47, 4F
→
03/16 00:48, , 5F
03/16 00:48, 5F
→
03/16 00:48, , 6F
03/16 00:48, 6F
→
03/16 00:49, , 7F
03/16 00:49, 7F
→
03/16 00:49, , 8F
03/16 00:49, 8F
→
03/16 00:50, , 9F
03/16 00:50, 9F
→
03/16 00:58, , 10F
03/16 00:58, 10F
→
03/16 00:59, , 11F
03/16 00:59, 11F
→
03/16 00:59, , 12F
03/16 00:59, 12F
→
03/16 00:59, , 13F
03/16 00:59, 13F
推
03/16 01:13, , 14F
03/16 01:13, 14F
推
03/16 01:15, , 15F
03/16 01:15, 15F
→
03/16 01:16, , 16F
03/16 01:16, 16F
那其實這個討論串可以放大為:如果台灣擁有大規模毀滅性武器
※ 編輯: QuentinHu 來自: 175.180.112.57 (03/16 01:20)
推
03/16 01:23, , 17F
03/16 01:23, 17F
→
03/16 01:24, , 18F
03/16 01:24, 18F
推
03/16 01:25, , 19F
03/16 01:25, 19F
→
03/16 01:28, , 20F
03/16 01:28, 20F
推
03/16 01:36, , 21F
03/16 01:36, 21F
→
03/16 01:36, , 22F
03/16 01:36, 22F
推
03/16 01:41, , 23F
03/16 01:41, 23F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 2 篇):
假設
5
14