[閒聊] 對身障新制之我見
<先>
個人對身障新制是支持與肯定的
總不能讓心存僥倖的朋友因為身障福利而有所眷戀
所謂眷戀 指的是明明無法成為身障而自殘
但我想此政策之推行
皆在應全面而有效的對於身障朋友想有而礙於法令無法得到的
例如居家照護、社區醫療等等
但就重度身障年限重新審驗部份則有待商榷
怎麼說呢 僅就重度身障審驗談談己身之看法
<重度身障之審驗年限>
首先先舉個例子
甲為長期坐於輪椅而終其一生之朋友
今年七月或三年後每五年需要重新驗證是否可以不用輪椅代步
讓他好不快樂 想想醫療體系、社工員訪查皆不能讓他在五年後有所改善
那每五年審驗是否程度有何意義??
今天看到輪椅朋友在百貨公司購物 心中突然冒出一個大問號
他或她在輪椅依賴過程中 能否每五年就能逐漸脫離輪椅代步而取得中度或輕度身障
在舊制中他是永久重度有效的 那新制不就要看他是否在騙取社會資源嗎??
每五年審一次對他而言是擾民政策而非利民
今天不是說永久是一項福利 而是免去定期審驗之困擾
當然這是有足以認定的程度才是永久資格的
又例如個人在國中畢業前夕 竟被兵役科來函通知去檢驗是否需服役
當時我想太荒唐了 我的手抖到不行還要服役??
如果六個叔叔抓我的手才蓋出像樣的指紋
媽媽見狀大罵不應該
那後來才去驗程度 成為永久有效而無法改善的資格
今天一直在想 每五年審驗一次的功用為何?
它是指每五年能幫助我們逐漸脫離重度身障程度嗎?
還是希望我們每五年都去給行政人員看一看??
各位有不同想法嗎??
<結語>
不論是輪椅、智能、或肢體的身障朋友都是為社會中值得尊敬的朋友
如同已故友人朱仲祥 長期與床為伍
這樣的生活是他願意等嗎? 而永久有效不就是對他是種免去勞師動眾的解決方法嗎?
這點立委去體驗時沒有想到的嗎
試想今天如果說永久有效是原罪
那就一視同仁沒有永久有效
今天要大改 不是擾民不然為何??
謹誌 身障板
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.161.219.85
→
03/18 07:09, , 1F
03/18 07:09, 1F
→
03/18 07:10, , 2F
03/18 07:10, 2F
→
03/18 07:12, , 3F
03/18 07:12, 3F
→
03/18 07:12, , 4F
03/18 07:12, 4F
→
03/18 07:12, , 5F
03/18 07:12, 5F
→
03/18 07:13, , 6F
03/18 07:13, 6F
推
03/18 08:47, , 7F
03/18 08:47, 7F
→
03/18 08:48, , 8F
03/18 08:48, 8F
→
03/18 08:50, , 9F
03/18 08:50, 9F
推
03/18 13:46, , 10F
03/18 13:46, 10F
→
03/18 13:47, , 11F
03/18 13:47, 11F
→
03/18 13:48, , 12F
03/18 13:48, 12F
推
03/18 14:36, , 13F
03/18 14:36, 13F
→
03/18 14:36, , 14F
03/18 14:36, 14F
→
03/18 14:37, , 15F
03/18 14:37, 15F
→
03/18 14:37, , 16F
03/18 14:37, 16F
→
03/18 14:38, , 17F
03/18 14:38, 17F
→
03/18 18:09, , 18F
03/18 18:09, 18F
→
03/18 18:10, , 19F
03/18 18:10, 19F
推
03/18 18:16, , 20F
03/18 18:16, 20F
→
03/18 18:16, , 21F
03/18 18:16, 21F
推
03/18 18:20, , 22F
03/18 18:20, 22F
→
03/18 18:20, , 23F
03/18 18:20, 23F
→
03/18 18:32, , 24F
03/18 18:32, 24F
→
03/18 18:34, , 25F
03/18 18:34, 25F
→
03/18 18:37, , 26F
03/18 18:37, 26F
→
03/18 18:38, , 27F
03/18 18:38, 27F
→
03/18 18:38, , 28F
03/18 18:38, 28F
→
03/18 18:46, , 29F
03/18 18:46, 29F
→
03/18 18:48, , 30F
03/18 18:48, 30F
→
03/18 18:49, , 31F
03/18 18:49, 31F
→
03/18 18:49, , 32F
03/18 18:49, 32F
→
03/18 18:50, , 33F
03/18 18:50, 33F
→
03/18 18:50, , 34F
03/18 18:50, 34F
→
03/18 18:52, , 35F
03/18 18:52, 35F
→
03/18 18:52, , 36F
03/18 18:52, 36F
→
03/18 18:57, , 37F
03/18 18:57, 37F
→
03/18 18:57, , 38F
03/18 18:57, 38F
推
03/18 19:37, , 39F
03/18 19:37, 39F
還有 30 則推文
推
03/18 23:03, , 70F
03/18 23:03, 70F
推
03/19 00:08, , 71F
03/19 00:08, 71F
→
03/19 00:16, , 72F
03/19 00:16, 72F
→
03/19 00:16, , 73F
03/19 00:16, 73F
→
03/19 00:17, , 74F
03/19 00:17, 74F
→
03/19 00:19, , 75F
03/19 00:19, 75F
→
03/19 00:20, , 76F
03/19 00:20, 76F
推
03/19 00:41, , 77F
03/19 00:41, 77F
→
03/19 00:42, , 78F
03/19 00:42, 78F
推
03/19 00:43, , 79F
03/19 00:43, 79F
→
03/19 00:43, , 80F
03/19 00:43, 80F
→
03/19 00:44, , 81F
03/19 00:44, 81F
→
03/19 00:44, , 82F
03/19 00:44, 82F
→
03/19 00:44, , 83F
03/19 00:44, 83F
→
03/19 00:45, , 84F
03/19 00:45, 84F
→
03/19 00:45, , 85F
03/19 00:45, 85F
推
03/19 08:16, , 86F
03/19 08:16, 86F
→
03/19 08:18, , 87F
03/19 08:18, 87F
→
03/19 08:19, , 88F
03/19 08:19, 88F
→
03/19 10:08, , 89F
03/19 10:08, 89F
推
03/19 10:08, , 90F
03/19 10:08, 90F
推
03/19 13:51, , 91F
03/19 13:51, 91F
→
03/19 13:52, , 92F
03/19 13:52, 92F
→
03/19 13:53, , 93F
03/19 13:53, 93F
→
03/19 13:53, , 94F
03/19 13:53, 94F
推
03/19 17:29, , 95F
03/19 17:29, 95F
→
03/19 17:30, , 96F
03/19 17:30, 96F
→
03/19 17:31, , 97F
03/19 17:31, 97F
→
03/21 10:15, , 98F
03/21 10:15, 98F
→
03/21 10:16, , 99F
03/21 10:16, 99F
→
03/21 10:18, , 100F
03/21 10:18, 100F
推
03/21 11:37, , 101F
03/21 11:37, 101F
推
03/21 16:51, , 102F
03/21 16:51, 102F
→
03/21 16:51, , 103F
03/21 16:51, 103F
→
03/21 16:52, , 104F
03/21 16:52, 104F
推
03/21 21:07, , 105F
03/21 21:07, 105F
推
03/21 21:17, , 106F
03/21 21:17, 106F
推
03/21 21:25, , 107F
03/21 21:25, 107F
推
03/22 00:05, , 108F
03/22 00:05, 108F
推
03/23 16:56, , 109F
03/23 16:56, 109F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):
閒聊
28
109