[問題] Nu skin 的TRA真的有效嗎?
如題,經由朋友介紹去NP測量體脂肪,因為之前
有吃過Nu skin的產品與賀保芙的產品,效果都有
限,甚至沒有什麼作用,曾經打電話問如新的專員
專員只說因為我青春期的時候快速增胖,所以脂肪
細胞數量太多,要減肥只有手術一個方法而已。
後來由朋友介紹後再去NP測量體脂肪,也告訴我之
前因為使用方式不對,且只用纖黛麗的產品,所以
這次他們建議我使用D套餐,加上吸油丸與靈知(為什麼要吃靈芝??)
費用總共約是46000元,想問的是針對”脂肪細胞過多”
的肥胖真的有用嗎?因為所費不貲,所以想要多點資訊
謝謝大家囉。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 210.202.241.221
→
06/27 13:35, , 1F
06/27 13:35, 1F
→
06/27 13:55, , 2F
06/27 13:55, 2F
→
06/27 15:31, , 3F
06/27 15:31, 3F
→
06/27 15:32, , 4F
06/27 15:32, 4F
→
06/27 15:37, , 5F
06/27 15:37, 5F
推
06/27 15:58, , 6F
06/27 15:58, 6F
→
06/27 15:59, , 7F
06/27 15:59, 7F
推
06/27 16:22, , 8F
06/27 16:22, 8F
→
06/27 17:56, , 9F
06/27 17:56, 9F
推
06/27 22:01, , 10F
06/27 22:01, 10F
推
06/28 03:37, , 11F
06/28 03:37, 11F
推
06/28 09:35, , 12F
06/28 09:35, 12F
推
06/28 11:20, , 13F
06/28 11:20, 13F
→
06/28 11:20, , 14F
06/28 11:20, 14F
→
06/28 11:21, , 15F
06/28 11:21, 15F
→
06/28 11:24, , 16F
06/28 11:24, 16F
→
06/28 11:25, , 17F
06/28 11:25, 17F
→
06/28 11:27, , 18F
06/28 11:27, 18F
→
06/28 11:28, , 19F
06/28 11:28, 19F
推
06/28 11:30, , 20F
06/28 11:30, 20F
推
06/28 14:24, , 21F
06/28 14:24, 21F
推
06/28 15:04, , 22F
06/28 15:04, 22F
推
06/28 18:12, , 23F
06/28 18:12, 23F
→
06/28 18:12, , 24F
06/28 18:12, 24F
推
06/28 20:14, , 25F
06/28 20:14, 25F
→
06/28 20:15, , 26F
06/28 20:15, 26F
→
06/28 20:16, , 27F
06/28 20:16, 27F
→
06/28 20:17, , 28F
06/28 20:17, 28F
→
06/28 20:17, , 29F
06/28 20:17, 29F
→
06/28 20:18, , 30F
06/28 20:18, 30F
→
06/28 20:19, , 31F
06/28 20:19, 31F
推
06/28 23:28, , 32F
06/28 23:28, 32F
→
06/28 23:29, , 33F
06/28 23:29, 33F
→
06/28 23:29, , 34F
06/28 23:29, 34F
→
06/28 23:30, , 35F
06/28 23:30, 35F
→
06/28 23:31, , 36F
06/28 23:31, 36F
→
06/28 23:37, , 37F
06/28 23:37, 37F
→
06/28 23:42, , 38F
06/28 23:42, 38F
推
06/28 23:47, , 39F
06/28 23:47, 39F
→
06/28 23:48, , 40F
06/28 23:48, 40F
→
06/28 23:49, , 41F
06/28 23:49, 41F
→
06/28 23:50, , 42F
06/28 23:50, 42F
→
06/28 23:51, , 43F
06/28 23:51, 43F
→
06/28 23:52, , 44F
06/28 23:52, 44F
推
06/28 23:55, , 45F
06/28 23:55, 45F
推
06/29 00:17, , 46F
06/29 00:17, 46F
→
06/29 00:18, , 47F
06/29 00:18, 47F
→
06/29 00:20, , 48F
06/29 00:20, 48F
推
06/29 00:20, , 49F
06/29 00:20, 49F
→
06/29 00:39, , 50F
06/29 00:39, 50F
→
06/29 00:45, , 51F
06/29 00:45, 51F
推
06/29 00:48, , 52F
06/29 00:48, 52F
推
06/29 08:22, , 53F
06/29 08:22, 53F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):