[問題] 6.5級防手震是防手震級數的極限?
原文
http://www.amateurphotographer.co.uk/latest/photo-news/exclusive-interview-
setsuya-kataoka-olympus-95731
縮網址
http://tinyurl.com/gou9pel
Olympus的部門副經理Setsuya Kataoka在接受Amateur Photographer訪問時
當E-M1的機身本身5.5級防手震搭配鏡頭OIS時,
整體可以達到6.5級防手震,
而6.5級防手震在考慮地球自轉影響的情況下,
最高可達到的防手震級數。
有前輩可以提示這是怎麼計算的嗎?
而且如果感光元件跟被拍攝物都在地球上用同樣的角速度rad/s在位移
跟在一個不會自轉的星球上使用防手震有什麼差別?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 140.113.149.100
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/DSLR/M.1475006940.A.73B.html
→
09/28 04:24, , 1F
09/28 04:24, 1F
→
09/28 04:24, , 2F
09/28 04:24, 2F
→
09/28 04:24, , 3F
09/28 04:24, 3F
→
09/28 04:33, , 4F
09/28 04:33, 4F
→
09/28 04:33, , 5F
09/28 04:33, 5F
推
09/28 04:38, , 6F
09/28 04:38, 6F
對呀,但陀螺儀與地球的自轉關係是...?
推
09/28 07:03, , 7F
09/28 07:03, 7F
推
09/28 07:32, , 8F
09/28 07:32, 8F
推
09/28 11:49, , 9F
09/28 11:49, 9F
推
09/28 14:55, , 10F
09/28 14:55, 10F
→
09/28 14:55, , 11F
09/28 14:55, 11F
看了還是不懂XD
推
09/28 23:11, , 12F
09/28 23:11, 12F
推
09/29 05:57, , 13F
09/29 05:57, 13F
→
09/29 05:57, , 14F
09/29 05:57, 14F
→
09/29 05:58, , 15F
09/29 05:58, 15F
→
09/29 05:59, , 16F
09/29 05:59, 16F
推
09/29 06:02, , 17F
09/29 06:02, 17F
→
09/29 06:02, , 18F
09/29 06:02, 18F
→
09/29 06:04, , 19F
09/29 06:04, 19F
※ 編輯: ferrinatice (140.113.149.100), 09/29/2016 18:44:26
推
09/29 19:00, , 20F
09/29 19:00, 20F
→
09/29 19:01, , 21F
09/29 19:01, 21F
推
09/30 13:20, , 22F
09/30 13:20, 22F
→
09/30 13:20, , 23F
09/30 13:20, 23F
推
09/30 13:25, , 24F
09/30 13:25, 24F
→
09/30 13:26, , 25F
09/30 13:26, 25F
推
09/30 13:27, , 26F
09/30 13:27, 26F
→
09/30 13:28, , 27F
09/30 13:28, 27F
→
09/30 13:29, , 28F
09/30 13:29, 28F
→
09/30 13:29, , 29F
09/30 13:29, 29F
→
09/30 13:29, , 30F
09/30 13:29, 30F
推
10/02 14:26, , 31F
10/02 14:26, 31F
推
10/02 19:18, , 32F
10/02 19:18, 32F