+ +綠卡事件我主要是看官員的有無說謊+效率+態度
基本上我認為有比忠誠度更高的要求..
就是我想了解那些當官的有無公然說謊+辦事效率+對事情的態度
1.有無公然在媒體上對人民說謊..
是不是有第一時間用閃避的言詞說
自動失效,撤銷中...之類的話
正常來講,我若是一個有綠卡的官員
我肯定不是這些卡的專業,
既然不是專業,就不應該跟人民說'自動失效'之類的話
一個為公共事務負責任的人,應該為公共作最大的滿足
理論上應該請出專業的單位背書,尤其在這雙方有爭議的時候
更不應該大聲對人民說...自動失效是常識
這樣不只解決不了事情,還會擴大
2.處事的效率
一件事情有沒有第一時間跳出來說明
還是思考個1.2天,再講出一個跟自認為合理的解釋
發生到最後結束到底花多少時間
都看在眼裡
3.態度
對於綠卡的態度,是以國際觀,跟試圖合理化..不去解決
老大...火都燒起來..以為大事化小的方式就不會燒嗎?
已經到這田地,還能表現不以為意的態度
這態度是身為一個替公共服務的方式?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 61.230.52.204
※ 編輯: dist 來自: 61.230.52.204 (06/10 20:30)
推
06/10 22:17, , 1F
06/10 22:17, 1F
→
06/10 22:18, , 2F
06/10 22:18, 2F
→
06/10 22:18, , 3F
06/10 22:18, 3F
推
06/10 23:39, , 4F
06/10 23:39, 4F
→
06/10 23:40, , 5F
06/10 23:40, 5F
→
06/10 23:41, , 6F
06/10 23:41, 6F
推
06/10 23:42, , 7F
06/10 23:42, 7F
→
06/10 23:42, , 8F
06/10 23:42, 8F
→
06/10 23:44, , 9F
06/10 23:44, 9F
推
06/10 23:44, , 10F
06/10 23:44, 10F
→
06/10 23:44, , 11F
06/10 23:44, 11F
→
06/10 23:45, , 12F
06/10 23:45, 12F
推
06/10 23:46, , 13F
06/10 23:46, 13F
→
06/10 23:47, , 14F
06/10 23:47, 14F
→
06/10 23:49, , 15F
06/10 23:49, 15F
推
06/10 23:50, , 16F
06/10 23:50, 16F
→
06/10 23:51, , 17F
06/10 23:51, 17F
→
06/11 00:21, , 18F
06/11 00:21, 18F
→
06/11 00:23, , 19F
06/11 00:23, 19F
→
06/11 00:23, , 20F
06/11 00:23, 20F
→
06/11 00:24, , 21F
06/11 00:24, 21F
→
06/11 00:28, , 22F
06/11 00:28, 22F
→
06/11 00:28, , 23F
06/11 00:28, 23F
→
06/11 00:30, , 24F
06/11 00:30, 24F
→
06/11 00:31, , 25F
06/11 00:31, 25F
→
06/11 00:32, , 26F
06/11 00:32, 26F
→
06/11 00:33, , 27F
06/11 00:33, 27F
推
06/11 01:17, , 28F
06/11 01:17, 28F
→
06/11 01:18, , 29F
06/11 01:18, 29F
推
06/11 01:32, , 30F
06/11 01:32, 30F
→
06/11 02:16, , 31F
06/11 02:16, 31F
→
06/11 02:18, , 32F
06/11 02:18, 32F
→
06/11 03:50, , 33F
06/11 03:50, 33F
推
06/11 08:52, , 34F
06/11 08:52, 34F
→
06/11 08:52, , 35F
06/11 08:52, 35F
→
06/11 10:24, , 36F
06/11 10:24, 36F
推
06/11 14:05, , 37F
06/11 14:05, 37F
推
06/11 17:04, , 38F
06/11 17:04, 38F
推
06/12 04:11, , 39F
06/12 04:11, 39F
→
06/12 04:11, , 40F
06/12 04:11, 40F
→
06/16 19:08, , 41F
06/16 19:08, 41F
→
06/16 19:09, , 42F
06/16 19:09, 42F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 34 篇):