Re: Clean up bind commit to master, revert to vendor
[X-Post to kernel@ for discussion]
Jan Lentfer wrote:
> there was some discussion on irc about where README.DRAGONFLY and
> README.DELETED had to go.
>
> I have left it the way I did it of vendor/LESS and as it was sugested on
> irc (README.DRAGONFLY on master, README.DELETED on vendor).
>
> But generally this should be clarified and the consensus should make
> it's way into development(7).
Yes, we should decide. But both should be on the same branch, for
coherency.
Reasons for master:
- those files don't belong to the tar ball
Reasons for vendor branch:
- the READMEs describe the files (and what was removed) of the tar ball
I don't mind either, just coherency. I propose to decide on what goes
where first, and after that do the import. Or at least pack both files
into the same branch.
cheers
simon
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 3 之 10 篇)：