Re: BPF extensions
On Mon, Jan 24, 2005 at 12:19:19PM -0800, Jeffrey Hsu wrote:
> +void
> +bpfattach2(struct ifnet *ifp, u_int dlt, u_int hdrlen, struct bpf_if
> **driverp)
>
> Same here. Use a more descriptive name than attach2.
I've used bpfattach_dlt, that should perfectly reflect what the
function is about.
The patch (http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/~joerg/bpf.diff) is updated
to reflect this change, the new comments for bpf_[m]_tap* and the
macros. The /* XXX */ comment has been replaced by the spl protection,
it's needed.
More comments?
Joerg
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 7 篇)：