Re: [PATCH] fix /boot/loader for extended slices
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
> (a) There are no minor versions from the ELF point of view...
> We solve (a) by not using minor numbers...
I remember clearly that you explained that to me once before.
There is (obviously) something I don't understand, however.
Where in the system is this policy actually implemented?
I am guessing that the loader (ld-elf?) determines the policy
regarding the naming of libraries. Am I correct?
Thanks for any clues.
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 13 之 14 篇)：