Re: Documentation work

看板DFBSD_submit作者時間21年前 (2004/05/05 13:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串3/5 (看更多)
On May 4, 2004, at 3:43 PM, Justin C. Sherrill wrote: > A first stab at the docs: > > http://forknibbler.com/guide/ Cool. I know documentation can take a lot of time. I'm very sad to see the very same style layout for the documentation as FreeBSD is using. I don't think the style FreeBSD has used over the years has lead to anything good for people. I find the documents very hard to navigate on the website. Though the navigation problem could be a fall back from the horribly broken search the pages have. DragonFly is very much an type of avant garde movement. I would very much like to see the same thing happen for the documentation. I don't want to seem negative at all towards the work that anyone has done so far. It looks really good. But I think as for documentation, the most important item should be to document the API. This has been one of the biggest downfalls of FreeBSD, not being able to maintain a stable API so that it could be properly documented. -DR
文章代碼(AID): #10c7KH00 (DFBSD_submit)
文章代碼(AID): #10c7KH00 (DFBSD_submit)