Re: DragonFly BSD Goals/Direction
On Sat, Dec 03, 2011 at 12:46:29AM -0500, Justin Sherrill wrote:
>
> In the long term, I'd like to have DragonFly known as a server
> operating system. Being a BSD platform and trying to catch up on all
> the different desktop enviroments is worthwhile, but we don't have the
> resources to do it better than, say, Canonical, so it's not worth
> having it as our focus.
Desktop support is also mainly a pkgsrc issue.
IMHO, the only worthwile thing we could do on this front is replacing
the current USB stack.
--
Francois Tigeot
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 8 之 14 篇)：