Re: [GSoC] HAMMER compression and new unionfs
:hm, seems difficult for me.. To have "whiteout database file" on the top
:of writable directory, would be another implementation? Then how can I
:avoid reading from/writing to the database file?
:
:Regards,
:Naohiro
The alternatives are expensive. For example, you could create a
special <filename>.<magicnumber> file or something like that
to represent the deleted file. Any directory entry or stat or open
or other operation would then have to check whether the magic file
exists or not when looking up <filename> successfully, and act as
if <filename> didn't exist if found.
I'm not sure I'd like a unionfs having to do that but it would be
fairly easy to implement.
Using whiteouts is a non-starter, they never worked well even when
unionfs was being used with UFS because the only way to backup a
UFS filesystem using whiteouts was to use dump/restore.
-Matt
Matthew Dillon
<dillon@backplane.com>
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 14 之 14 篇)：