Re: TCP‐MD5 (rfc2385) implementation in DragonFlyBSD

看板DFBSD_kernel作者時間15年前 (2010/09/18 03:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串2/2 (看更多)
:>I had a lot of compilation errors building a unmodified kernel with the FAST_IPSEC :>option, is the FAST_IPSEC option supported in DragonFlyBSD ? : :I'm not sure if FAST_IPSEC is supported on DragonFly, :it seems like it has been broken for en extended period of time. : :If it isn't supported we sill update LINT to reflect this. : :I have opened issue 1843 (http://bugs.dragonflybsd.org/issue1843), :to track & resolve this issue. : : -thomas It hasn't been ported to the new netmsg infrastructure and it is also not MPSAFE. The normal IPSEC code has been ported and is at least somewhat MP safe, so it might actually work. The fast-ipsec code is another matter. Why do we have two copies of ipsec in the system anyway? -Matt Matthew Dillon <dillon@backplane.com>
文章代碼(AID): #1Caxhpp_ (DFBSD_kernel)
文章代碼(AID): #1Caxhpp_ (DFBSD_kernel)