RE: Port DragonFly to Xen platform

看板DFBSD_kernel作者時間16年前 (2010/03/24 16:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串1/2 (看更多)
: As a side effect of this, will interrupt routing need to be fixed? I don't see how this has anything to do with a Xen port. Our interrupt routing is not broken but rather outdated. We still rely on the mptable instead of doing ACPI interrupt routing (and we also lack MSI support), but that's a different issue, unless Xen *requires* MSI, which I doubt. : Also, I am looking at doing the NUMA project (investigation stage) so : that could work with a Xen port nicely. : I, myself look forward to a Xen port ! While I see the point of a Xen port, I'm starting to think that something along the lines of KVM or hardware virtualization support for vkernels might be more interesting and relevant. Cheers, Alex Hornung
文章代碼(AID): #1BgSR0ZX (DFBSD_kernel)
文章代碼(AID): #1BgSR0ZX (DFBSD_kernel)