Re: DoxyGen Style Kernel API reference.

看板DFBSD_kernel作者時間16年前 (2009/09/05 04:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串12/18 (看更多)
Brian Gianforcaro schrieb: > Depending on how nice you want the documentation to be, and how good > the existing documentation is. > > I'd be more than willing to put all my effort into modifying the > existing comments to be doxygen compliant, if this what is finally > decided. I wonder, how would the existing man9 manpages fit into the picture? Maintaining man9 and doxygen in parallel? I think there is even less chance that developers will care about both man9 & doxygen than taking care of man9 alone. Fold the info from the manpages into the code as comments and discard man9 entirely? That sounds like either a lot of comments would have to be added or (in case you should decide to take only selected portions of man9 into the comments) a lot of documentation would have to be discarded. Note that I'm just trying to realistically picture what would happen if we decide to use doxygen for kernel documentation. Sascha -- http://yoyodyne.ath.cx
文章代碼(AID): #1AeN83Rw (DFBSD_kernel)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1AeN83Rw (DFBSD_kernel)