Re: Dfly-1.2.0 using fbsdports+firebirdsql
Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
> Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai wrote:
>
>> Actually, it is merged from current.
>>
>> I don't think the NetBSD/OpenBSD pullup terminology fits either.
>>
>> And in a sense it is still a merge from the development tree to the
>> stable
>> tree(s), yes?
>
>
> Does 'backport' sound any good?
>
> Cheers,
> -- Thomas E. Spanjaard
> tgen@netphreax.net
Lets just stick with MFC, it sounds nice and to the point.
-Hiten
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 7 之 17 篇)：