討論串(共17篇) - Dfly-1.2.0 using fbsdports+firebirdsql - 看板DFBSD_kernel

看板 [ DFBSD_kernel ]

討論串Dfly-1.2.0 using fbsdports+firebirdsql

共 17 篇文章

排序：最新先 | 最舊先 | 留言數 | 推文總分

內容預覽：開啟 | 關閉 | 只限未讀

首頁

尾頁

#17

Re: Dfly-1.2.0 using fbsdports+firebirdsql

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者dillon.時間20年前 (2005/04/21 02:01)資訊

內容預覽:

I'm not going to change the terminology just because we are now calling. the current-equivalent 'development'. It's going to stay MFC as that. is a te

#16

Re: Dfly-1.2.0 using fbsdports+firebirdsql

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者mhellwig.時間20年前 (2005/04/21 02:01)資訊

內容預覽:

Chris Pressey wrote:. > On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:32:25 +0200. > Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> wrote:. >. >. >>-On [20050420 12:02], Thomas E.

(還有586個字)

#15

Re: Dfly-1.2.0 using fbsdports+firebirdsql

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者cpressey.時間20年前 (2005/04/21 02:01)資訊

內容預覽:

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005 16:32:25 +0200. Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai <asmodai@wxs.nl> wrote:. > -On [20050420 12:02], Thomas E. Spanjaard (tgen@netphreax.net) w

(還有251個字)

#14

Re: Dfly-1.2.0 using fbsdports+firebirdsql

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者tgen.時間20年前 (2005/04/21 02:01)資訊

內容預覽:

Erik P. Skaalerud wrote:. > Non-BSD folks are more likely to go WTF either we use MFC or MFD. MFC is. > a BSD-term, isnt it? :-). Not where I come fro

#13

Re: Dfly-1.2.0 using fbsdports+firebirdsql

推噓0(0推 )留言0則，0人參與作者erik.時間20年前 (2005/04/21 02:01)資訊

內容預覽:

Jonas Sundstr繹m wrote:. >>MFD would be a nice name, but alot of people are. >>used to MFC, so I agree with Hiten on this one.. >. >. > Non-BSD folks a

(還有11個字)

首頁

尾頁