Re: Ready for 20050309? (Re: HEADS UP - ACPICA code updated to 2
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :Ok, while your head is (hopefully) still up, if 20050211 works
> :without a problem and you have time, can you try the following
> :procedure to make sure the newer version 20050309 doesn't introduce
> :a new problem?
> :
> :% cd /sys/contrib/dev
> :% fetch http://developer.intel.com/technology/iapc/acpi/downloads/acpica-unix-20050309.tar.gz
> :% tar zxf acpica-unix-20050309.tar.gz
> :% cd /sys/dev/acpica5
> :% sed -i.bak -e '/^SYSACPICA_VERSION/s/20050211/20050309/' Makefile.inc
> :% setenv MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX /var/tmp/obj
> :% make obj && make depend && make && su root -c 'make install'
> :(reboot your computer, drop into loader prompt, and type `boot -v'.
> : you can remove /var/tmp/obj afterwards)
> :
> :I'm going to update the ACPICA code to 20050309 soon because, after
> :(or just before) the last import, Intel released two versions which
> :claim to fix AE_AML_BUFFER_LIMIT issue, and in fact there's been
> :one report that 20050211 had a problem on the reporter's computer which
> :was solved by 20050309. So if the latter has no other issues, I want to
> :update it before the next slip of -Stable tag.
> :
> :Thanks.
>
> Lets move fast on this. I want to slip the stable tag ASAP and I
> (was) only waiting on Jeff's tcp panic fix to be committed before
> doing it. I was going to address the libc_r issue with Opera
> blocking for long periods of time by slipping it again after that is
> found and fix.
>
> -Matt
> Matthew Dillon
> <dillon@backplane.com>
(Just) Opera? Does that mean that (the perhaps more widely used)
Firefox *has*
been fixed already? If not, no sweat ....
Bill
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 2 之 5 篇)：