Re: RFC: backporting GEOM to the 4.x branch
On Thursday 03 March 2005 00:05, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Personally speaking I have no problem making ultra encryption available
> to the general public, but I do believe (personally speaking) that the
> *default* should be something slightly less secure just so criminals
> and terrorists (at least the stupid ones, which is most or they wouldn't
> be criminals or terrorists), don't get an automatic boost from our work.
"Terrorists use Linux."
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 33 之 39 篇)：