Re: setjmp/lonjmp
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :> I'm going to nit on this.
> :>=20
> :> Using longjmp is evil. Period.
> :
> :Is that the only justification you have for your opinion?
> :
> :Greg
>
> The problem, Greg, is that when you use something like that in
> a large project you basically remove a large number of programmers
> from the set of programmers able to work, maintain, and extend your code.
>
> Your code is especially difficult to maintain. I'm not saying its bad,
<...>
A word from "the masses": this is completely justified -- developer's --
point of view. On the other hand: cleaning of the code per se gives
plenty of opportunities to break what's working. Like, reducing vinum
functionality (or breaking it), or having ipfw removed. Doesn't look good.
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 12 篇)：