Re: RFC: backporting GEOM to the 4.x branch
dillon@apollo.backplane.com wrote:
> I don't have any plans to backport GEOM. We have plans to create a
> more generic device and vfs infrastructure, which is similar, but
> we have no plans to backport the actual GEOM code.
When do you expect the VFS code to be ready for the implementation of such
a GEOM-like layer? Also, do you intend to keep the API and the terminology
compliant with that of GEOM?
ALeine
___________________________________________________________________
WebMail FREE http://mail.austrosearch.net
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 6 之 39 篇)：