Re: iostat, vmstat and other kvm(4) users
On Fri, Nov 19, 2004 at 12:19:40PM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:
> Ick. Not two whole separate programs. Why not just have both
> capabilities in one program based on whether -N/-M are specified or
> not ?
Not two separate programs. I think we would still use one version, but
using conditional compilation to get the kvm backend. The normal end-user
wouldn't have to cope with most kernel changes and the developer gets
his ps-kvm or whatever we want to name it. The same principle can be
applied to the tools as well.
Joerg
> -Matt
> Matthew Dillon
> <dillon@backplane.com>
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 7 篇)：