Re: pidfile
:Fixed the mixup with pidfile that was preventing kerberos5 from being
:built after pidfile() was added to libutil. This could probably be done
:right by redoing configure with the later libutil; configure does look
:at this. However, I don't know the canonical method, other than just by
:hand, of getting from autoconf contrib packages to the bmake system...
:
:Does noone else use kerberos? I've seen no complaints.
:
:-- Pete
Maybe we should rename pidfile() in libutil to something else
instead. It's a pretty aweful name for libutil to choose to use
anyway! Maybe something like make_pidfile() ? Comments? From
what I can tell there isn't much in our tree that actually uses it.
-Matt
討論串 (同標題文章)