Re: Heads Up: PF
Xin LI wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 20, 2004 at 12:39:03AM +0200, Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
>
>>with PF in tree, the size of certain mbuf parts has changed. You have to
>>fully rebuild your kernel and all third-party modules, otherwise
>>you might hit some corruptions.
>>
>>The PF module still has a slight problem, it doesn't destory the memory
>>zone it uses (because there's currently no API for that). It doesn't
>>affect static build kernels or those which don't unload pf.ko.
What needs to be included in the kernel for a static build?
Walter Venable
討論串 (同標題文章)