Re: Heads up: Contributions and advertisement clause

看板DFBSD_kernel作者時間21年前 (2004/09/13 02:01), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串6/11 (看更多)
On Wed, 8 Sep 2004 19:43:48 +0200 Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg@britannica.bec.de> wrote: > Hi all, > in the recent discussion, there was a consent that the fourth clause > of the original BSD license is mostly unnecessary now. It is still in > a lot of our code base, waiting to be cleaned up. For this to easier > in the future, I'd like to ask all commiters and distributers to > answer this mail if they agree with the removal. For those parts an > explicit adversitement is wanted, it should be noted explicitly. > > Doing it now saves us the paperwork for tracing down our own changes > later. We only have to verify / merge with FreeBSD, which is time > consuming enough. > > Joerg Yes, I agree with the removal. That is to say, any patch I submit to a file which contains a clause 4 that can be removed, should NOT be construed as further asserting clause 4. -Chris
文章代碼(AID): #11H8xo00 (DFBSD_kernel)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #11H8xo00 (DFBSD_kernel)