Re: Scheduler question
-On [20040906 17:32], walt (wa1ter@myrealbox.com) wrote:
>Matt has expressed some dissatisfaction with the current scheduler,
I'll gladly attach my sentiment to that.
>so I was interested to find some very enthusiastic reactions in the
>lkml to Con Kolivas's new staircase scheduler for linux. It was
>described as not only very effective but also as 'simple' in
>design. (See the 'Scheduler experiences' thread in lkml, 05Sep.)
I think that any typical scheduler such as present in either Linux or BSD
might not be fully optimal for DF given how we are switching major
subsystems to non-typical Unix ways of doing these. It might be better to
check out microkernels and see how they also do this.
Of course, I could be totally off base, as happens from time to time (or was
that almost all the time?), and then my above statement is at value void.
Btw Matt, I am getting insane from the intr 5 livelocked! livelock removed
messages. It floods my vty0. intr 5 is my audigy and typically scores
around 80000-85000 Hz and drops back to 8000 Hz and up and down and up and
....
--
Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven <asmodai(at)wxs.nl> / asmodai / kita no mono
Free Tibet! http://www.savetibet.org/ | http://www.tibet.nu/
http://www.tendra.org/ | http://www.in-nomine.org/
To the dull mind nature is leaden. To the illumined mind the whole world
burns and sparkles with light...
討論串 (同標題文章)