Re: git: Revert "rename amd64 architecture to x86_64"

看板DFBSD_commit作者時間16年前 (2009/11/08 05:32), 編輯推噓0(000)
留言0則, 0人參與, 最新討論串5/5 (看更多)
I go on vacation for a few days and we have commit war. Come on folks. Nobody should back out anyone else's commit unless it's something really trivial (like if the original committer made an obvious mistake and the commit only touched a few files anyway), and the original committer could not be contacted. i.e. where no conflict of opinion would is presumed. Certainly no large commit should be backed out without discussing it on IRC first, and I will moderate any final decision if the parties cannot reach a consensus. On root access to the machines: That's primarily for maintainance. Simon and Sascha both have root access on crater and in addition Justin as root access on leaf, and so on and so forth depending on the function of the machine. There is no particular pecking order here, just major project devlopers who have also committed their time to keeping the machines running smoothly, plus the provisio that both Avalon and Crater need to be kept as secure as possible. The access is not meant for any other action short of an emergency... meaning that you are unable to contact your's truely. Honestly I think both parties in this matter acted with an inappropriate level of vindictiveness. -- The original commit itself was sanctioned and is primarily being driven from the viewpoint that it will be easier to manage pkgsrc with the 64-bit platform set to x86_64. Please remember that our 64-bit platform is still deemed highly experimental. The time to determine what the best designator is for pkgsrc building on 64-bit platforms is NOW. The industry is generaly confused about the issue: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X86-64#Differences_between_AMD64_and_Intel_64 However, my take on it is that in documentation and papers people are basically calling things x86-64 now ("x86_64" being the arch name, I believe), and not "amd64". Many OS's still use the legacy "amd64" name but the feeling from the point of view of pkgsrc compatibility was that "x86_64" would work better. -- I will have to weigh my options and contact the two parties offline before I take any further action. In the mean time, I am locking this thread. If people want to discuss the merits of x86_64 vs amd64 for package building, please start a new thread for that discussion that leaves out personal issues. -Matt
文章代碼(AID): #1AzUTMhf (DFBSD_commit)
討論串 (同標題文章)
文章代碼(AID): #1AzUTMhf (DFBSD_commit)