Re: cvs commit: src/share Makefile src/share/doc Makefile src/us
Matthew Dillon wrote:
> :I have to say that I'm not really feeling comfortable with this commit.
> :While it's true that several of those documents are outdated and
> :historic there are some that still apply quite well and might be useful
> :to get new users going more quickly (at a point before they have the
> :source code, i.e. when booting from the LiveCD).
> :
> :Wouldn't it have been better to review them one by one and see what can
> :be scrapped or not?
> :
> :Sascha
>
> Well, lets take a poll. My feeling is that the documents either aren't
> used, or only a small part of them are used, or more up-to-date
> information is available on the web anyway (cut-and-paste a URL). Since
> nobody is likely to be installing named or sendmail without some outside
> access, I wouldn't expect the number of people actually using them
> to be very high.
>
> The last time I personally used those documents was once, a few years
> ago, to look some stuff up about named.
>
> -Matt
I don't see any point in building these papers; if someone is
interested in them, they can build it for themselves.
I have hardly used those documents, because better and updated
information is available on the Internet.
-Hiten
hmp@backplane.com
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 5 之 8 篇)：