看板 [ DFBSD_bugs ]
討論串[issue1942] non-zero exclusive count(Re: locking against
共 5 篇文章
內容預覽： 開啟 | 關閉 | 只限未讀
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁
#5
Re: [issue1942] non-zero exclusive count(Re: locking against
推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則，0人參與, 最新作者qhwt.時間15年前 (2010/12/30 20:32), 編輯資訊
0
0
0
內容預覽:
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 12:49:12AM -0800, Matthew Dillon wrote:. > Oh, put TDF_DEADLKTREAT back in guys. That was indeed one place where. > an exclusi
(還有258個字)
#4
Re: [issue1942] non-zero exclusive count(Re: locking against
推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則，0人參與, 最新作者dillon.時間15年前 (2010/12/29 17:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
0
內容預覽:
Ok, I think I fixed the non-zero exclusive count panic, please try. with the latest master (I pushed it).. It looks like a shared->exclusive upgrade c
(還有292個字)
#3
Re: [issue1942] non-zero exclusive count(Re: locking against
推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則，0人參與, 最新作者dillon.時間15年前 (2010/12/29 16:32), 編輯資訊
0
0
0
內容預覽:
Hmm. Ok, and I think my other patch might have issues as well. It. is still possible for a buffer cache buffer to get invalidated while. held, though
#2
Re: [issue1942] non-zero exclusive count(Re: locking against
推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則，0人參與, 最新作者qhwt.時間15年前 (2010/12/28 21:32), 編輯資訊
0
0
0
內容預覽:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 02:20:19AM -1000, Peter Avalos wrote:. > On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 04:45:59PM +0900, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote:. > > However, even
(還有544個字)
#1
Re: [issue1942] non-zero exclusive count(Re: locking against
推噓0(0推 0噓 0→)留言0則，0人參與, 最新作者qhwt.時間15年前 (2010/12/28 16:01), 編輯資訊
0
0
1
內容預覽:
On Tue, Dec 28, 2010 at 12:37:23AM +0000, Peter Avalos (via DragonFly issue tracker) wrote:>. > Peter Avalos <peter@theshell.com> added the comment:.
(還有736個字)
首頁
上一頁
1
下一頁
尾頁