Re: BTX Halted on X86_64 master
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig1F6C35CA3B58B1961704ED22
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Bill Hacker wrote:
> Thomas E. Spanjaard wrote:
>> Bill Hacker wrote:
>>> elekktretterr@exemail.com.au wrote:
>>>> Well this is rather embarassing. This aint a 64bit processor. I boug=
ht
>>>> this thing like half a year after I bought my AMD64 workstation and
>>>> I had
>>>> assumed (Core Duo) would be 64 bit.
>>>>
>>>> Sorry.....
>>>>
>>> Odd, that. Just which specific CPU do you have? Mobility-something,
>>> perchance?
>>>
>>> Not only the Core-2, but the earlier Core-D had Intel's '64-bit
>>> extensions' (mostly) cross-licensed from AMD.
>>>
>>> My Core-D happily ran FreeBSD ADM64 (6.2 beta onward).
>>>
>>> Is DFLY that different?
>>>
>>> Bill
>>
>> None of the Core Duo chips support EM64T. Are you perhaps confusing th=
e
>> Pentium D with the Core Duo? Also, all Core Duo chips were mobile ones=
,
>> save for the Xeon ULV ("Sossaman"), which was for dual-socket servers
>> (short-lived though, as a couple of months later Woodcrest and friends=
>> (Core 2-based) were released).
>=20
> ACK 'marketing Nomenclature' - (the 'Core-D' / Pentium D eg - pre 'Core=
> 2' having been presented as meaning 'Core Duo')
I've never seen the Pentium D marketed as "Core-D" around here though,
that'd have been awful :).
> I'll worry about all that when VIA Nano dualcore become common or ARM
> gets faster.
Haven't seen those Nano chips in the wild yet, unfortunately.
> Meanwhile, after half a century of listening to fan noise, I'm chasing
> lower power instead of raw speed and have come to rather enjoy what
> Simon & Garfunkel called 'the sounds of silence'.
What about a blindingly fast system, but running in another
(sound-proofed) room? :P
Btw, your e-mail address bounces.
--=20
Thomas E. Spanjaard
tgen@netphreax.net
tgen@deepbone.net
--------------enig1F6C35CA3B58B1961704ED22
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (NetBSD)
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJLJfyYAAoJEKE55rmjwpbT1YQH/AtBpHyRbAL76xpu9pmCelJl
8Dsbl7vQyE09NZZC8HZsH8BOyxoAtvCnnWKK85EQiIAyuLTReYezvY4c6ezj14de
cznkWALd6EbjRAPxmOy1yN4UgiWCYIuudcpyA3Y37BgoSuXslZS3vYbqVheqSmBv
8vQlCf3k9TRqzw5/VZ5jkTM62Br8lTRsqtdFA5S0m+lAtqMXDrxLHvURgZO9GtDZ
n4SVxUN18AfvUSXf1GuSBt2dCRE8AUQYmq8gvTlUxAOshPhLIyTcIu6L3S5YgmLL
qs/GwLciYYC3EUF4dWWjsY7d97v8ObSOnKpExfNYgTAbQko+LYYABnzd2ETVYKg=
=VEYE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig1F6C35CA3B58B1961704ED22--
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 9 之 10 篇)：