[討論] 後來發現板上中國人邏輯很簡單
1. 政府給的是正確可信的,不容質疑因為共產黨是讓人民信任的政府,內部有完美自我監督機制,不用像歐美一樣要全民監督
2. 媒體報導捧政府的就是正確報導,因為跟政府一致;批評政府的都是不可信的,可能受到歐美民主的荼毒,國內很多被滲透的地方
2.5 如果有外國媒體,稱讚中國的跟黨一致,正確這記者真有眼光;批評中國的都是輿論戰抹黑,意圖分裂中國故不可信
3. 在1、2前提下只能引用國內央視等黨媒,然後認為中國崛起好厲害、歐美都要衰退了,二十一世紀是中國人的時代
好像能理解一些什麼了?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.13.87.123
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/CrossStrait/M.1496288296.A.B9E.html
推
06/01 12:02, , 1F
06/01 12:02, 1F
→
06/01 12:02, , 2F
06/01 12:02, 2F
→
06/01 12:02, , 3F
06/01 12:02, 3F
推
06/01 12:37, , 4F
06/01 12:37, 4F
→
06/01 12:38, , 5F
06/01 12:38, 5F
→
06/01 12:39, , 6F
06/01 12:39, 6F
→
06/01 12:40, , 7F
06/01 12:40, 7F
→
06/01 12:41, , 8F
06/01 12:41, 8F
→
06/01 12:42, , 9F
06/01 12:42, 9F
→
06/01 12:42, , 10F
06/01 12:42, 10F
→
06/01 12:43, , 11F
06/01 12:43, 11F
→
06/01 15:33, , 12F
06/01 15:33, 12F
→
06/01 15:34, , 13F
06/01 15:34, 13F
→
06/01 15:36, , 14F
06/01 15:36, 14F
→
06/01 15:37, , 15F
06/01 15:37, 15F
→
06/01 15:38, , 16F
06/01 15:38, 16F
→
06/01 15:39, , 17F
06/01 15:39, 17F
→
06/01 15:39, , 18F
06/01 15:39, 18F
→
06/01 15:40, , 19F
06/01 15:40, 19F
→
06/01 15:41, , 20F
06/01 15:41, 20F
→
06/01 16:01, , 21F
06/01 16:01, 21F
推
06/01 16:08, , 22F
06/01 16:08, 22F
→
06/01 16:08, , 23F
06/01 16:08, 23F
→
06/01 16:09, , 24F
06/01 16:09, 24F
→
06/01 16:09, , 25F
06/01 16:09, 25F
→
06/01 16:09, , 26F
06/01 16:09, 26F
→
06/01 16:09, , 27F
06/01 16:09, 27F
→
06/01 16:09, , 28F
06/01 16:09, 28F
→
06/01 16:09, , 29F
06/01 16:09, 29F
→
06/01 16:09, , 30F
06/01 16:09, 30F
→
06/01 16:09, , 31F
06/01 16:09, 31F
→
06/01 16:10, , 32F
06/01 16:10, 32F
推
06/01 16:42, , 33F
06/01 16:42, 33F
→
06/01 16:42, , 34F
06/01 16:42, 34F
→
06/01 16:42, , 35F
06/01 16:42, 35F
→
06/01 16:47, , 36F
06/01 16:47, 36F
→
06/01 16:47, , 37F
06/01 16:47, 37F
→
06/01 16:48, , 38F
06/01 16:48, 38F
→
06/01 16:49, , 39F
06/01 16:49, 39F
→
06/01 16:49, , 40F
06/01 16:49, 40F
→
06/01 16:50, , 41F
06/01 16:50, 41F
→
06/01 16:50, , 42F
06/01 16:50, 42F
→
06/01 16:51, , 43F
06/01 16:51, 43F
→
06/01 16:52, , 44F
06/01 16:52, 44F
→
06/01 16:52, , 45F
06/01 16:52, 45F
→
06/01 16:56, , 46F
06/01 16:56, 46F
→
06/01 17:05, , 47F
06/01 17:05, 47F
→
06/01 17:06, , 48F
06/01 17:06, 48F
→
06/01 17:19, , 49F
06/01 17:19, 49F
→
06/01 17:19, , 50F
06/01 17:19, 50F
→
06/01 17:20, , 51F
06/01 17:20, 51F
→
06/01 20:37, , 52F
06/01 20:37, 52F
→
06/01 20:37, , 53F
06/01 20:37, 53F
→
06/01 20:37, , 54F
06/01 20:37, 54F
噓
06/01 21:17, , 55F
06/01 21:17, 55F
→
06/01 21:42, , 56F
06/01 21:42, 56F
→
06/01 21:43, , 57F
06/01 21:43, 57F
推
06/01 22:06, , 58F
06/01 22:06, 58F
→
06/01 22:10, , 59F
06/01 22:10, 59F
→
06/01 22:10, , 60F
06/01 22:10, 60F
→
06/01 22:16, , 61F
06/01 22:16, 61F
→
06/01 22:16, , 62F
06/01 22:16, 62F
→
06/01 22:16, , 63F
06/01 22:16, 63F
→
06/01 22:16, , 64F
06/01 22:16, 64F
推
06/01 22:37, , 65F
06/01 22:37, 65F
→
06/01 22:37, , 66F
06/01 22:37, 66F
→
06/01 22:37, , 67F
06/01 22:37, 67F
→
06/01 22:37, , 68F
06/01 22:37, 68F
→
06/01 22:37, , 69F
06/01 22:37, 69F
→
06/01 23:18, , 70F
06/01 23:18, 70F
→
06/01 23:19, , 71F
06/01 23:19, 71F
→
06/01 23:19, , 72F
06/01 23:19, 72F
→
06/01 23:19, , 73F
06/01 23:19, 73F
推
06/02 00:13, , 74F
06/02 00:13, 74F
→
06/02 00:13, , 75F
06/02 00:13, 75F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):