Re: [討論] 民主化后的台灣是沒落了還是崛起了?
※ 引述《twed (doudou)》之銘言:
: 經常听人說如果中華民族要真正崛起,必須要實行民主化
: 台灣作為華人為主体的社會已經民主化20多年了
: 相對于兩蔣時代的台灣,現在的台灣是崛起了呢還是沒落了?
: 大陸那些所謂的公知和海外流亡的异見人士都很欣賞台灣
: 但從沒說過台灣崛起了,請台灣朋友自己說說你們到底
: 掘了沒有?
討論這東西要有個客觀事實,隨便舉個十項。
1.生育力
2.經濟成長率
3.軍事能力
4.貪腐指數
5.文化影響力
6.科學研究
7.勞工權益
8.施政能力
9.外交
10.社會向心力
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.233.186.37
→
03/11 22:08, , 1F
03/11 22:08, 1F
→
03/11 22:09, , 2F
03/11 22:09, 2F
向心力的相反詞叫族群分裂,跟你提的這個巴竿子打不著。
推
03/11 22:09, , 3F
03/11 22:09, 3F
→
03/11 22:09, , 4F
03/11 22:09, 4F
→
03/11 22:10, , 5F
03/11 22:10, 5F
→
03/11 22:11, , 6F
03/11 22:11, 6F
→
03/11 22:11, , 7F
03/11 22:11, 7F
台灣人均才兩萬鎂,一堆人均三、四萬的歐美國生育率都強過台灣。
難道別人養育小孩成本叫低?
第一次看到生育率低拿「經濟越發展」來救援,這個不錯笑。
※ 編輯: inebriety 來自: 118.233.186.37 (03/11 22:15)
→
03/11 22:12, , 8F
03/11 22:12, 8F
→
03/11 22:12, , 9F
03/11 22:12, 9F
→
03/11 22:13, , 10F
03/11 22:13, 10F
→
03/11 22:13, , 11F
03/11 22:13, 11F
→
03/11 22:14, , 12F
03/11 22:14, 12F
→
03/11 22:15, , 13F
03/11 22:15, 13F
→
03/11 22:15, , 14F
03/11 22:15, 14F
推
03/11 22:18, , 15F
03/11 22:18, 15F
推
03/11 22:19, , 16F
03/11 22:19, 16F
→
03/11 22:19, , 17F
03/11 22:19, 17F
→
03/11 22:20, , 18F
03/11 22:20, 18F
推
03/11 22:24, , 19F
03/11 22:24, 19F
→
03/11 22:25, , 20F
03/11 22:25, 20F
→
03/11 22:26, , 21F
03/11 22:26, 21F
推
03/11 22:34, , 22F
03/11 22:34, 22F
推
03/11 22:43, , 23F
03/11 22:43, 23F
→
03/11 22:43, , 24F
03/11 22:43, 24F
→
03/11 22:43, , 25F
03/11 22:43, 25F
→
03/11 22:44, , 26F
03/11 22:44, 26F
→
03/11 22:44, , 27F
03/11 22:44, 27F
推
03/12 00:06, , 28F
03/12 00:06, 28F
→
03/12 00:07, , 29F
03/12 00:07, 29F
→
03/12 00:10, , 30F
03/12 00:10, 30F
→
03/12 00:11, , 31F
03/12 00:11, 31F
推
03/12 00:53, , 32F
03/12 00:53, 32F
→
03/12 00:54, , 33F
03/12 00:54, 33F
→
03/12 00:54, , 34F
03/12 00:54, 34F
→
03/12 00:56, , 35F
03/12 00:56, 35F
推
03/12 21:11, , 36F
03/12 21:11, 36F
→
03/12 21:11, , 37F
03/12 21:11, 37F
推
03/12 21:13, , 38F
03/12 21:13, 38F
→
03/12 21:14, , 39F
03/12 21:14, 39F
→
03/12 21:14, , 40F
03/12 21:14, 40F
→
03/12 21:14, , 41F
03/12 21:14, 41F
→
03/12 21:15, , 42F
03/12 21:15, 42F
→
03/12 21:15, , 43F
03/12 21:15, 43F
→
03/12 21:16, , 44F
03/12 21:16, 44F
→
03/12 21:16, , 45F
03/12 21:16, 45F
→
03/12 21:17, , 46F
03/12 21:17, 46F
→
03/12 21:17, , 47F
03/12 21:17, 47F
→
03/12 21:18, , 48F
03/12 21:18, 48F
→
03/12 21:18, , 49F
03/12 21:18, 49F
→
03/12 21:18, , 50F
03/12 21:18, 50F
推
03/12 21:29, , 51F
03/12 21:29, 51F
推
03/12 21:40, , 52F
03/12 21:40, 52F
推
03/12 21:43, , 53F
03/12 21:43, 53F
→
03/12 21:44, , 54F
03/12 21:44, 54F
推
03/12 21:52, , 55F
03/12 21:52, 55F
推
03/12 22:15, , 56F
03/12 22:15, 56F
→
03/12 22:15, , 57F
03/12 22:15, 57F
→
03/12 22:15, , 58F
03/12 22:15, 58F
→
03/13 01:13, , 59F
03/13 01:13, 59F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 4 篇):