Re: [請戰] PISA評比 上海少年冠全球
※ 引述《stayinalive (當代對話 百年論述)》之銘言:
: 全球首強的美國,竟然沒有前幾名
: 這也就算了,英法德也不如台灣南韓比利時??
: 評比可以弄到好像孔子和平獎般的流於搞笑
: 也不容易
這位童鞋你好像從來不看國外新聞吧。你看看紐約時報咋說的﹕
Top Test Scores From Shanghai Stun Educators
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/12/07/education/07education.html?_r=1&scp=1&sq=PISA&st=cse
: 東亞各國學生在一些數理測驗或考試上一向優秀
: 這種優秀說穿了也就是填鴨機械化而己
: 學生的腦子塞滿了東西,但是成年人腦子空空如也
: 各學術領域還是以歐美為宗,
: 徹底戳破東亞教育的自爽把戲
: 我不認為一個十幾歲的孩子要多麼的善於思考技巧
: 或是寫出深且廣的策論,
: 事實上也做不到
: 教育最核心的關鍵是啟發,而不是製造
: 台灣的排名低反而較有改革的希望,那種搞笑評比
: 留給別國愛怎麼自爽都可以
上文中這段話正好打了你的臉不曉得你明白不
“This is the first time that we have internationally comparable data on learning outcomes in China,” Mr. Schleicher said. “While that’s important, for me the real significance of these results is that they refute the commonly held hypothesis that China just produces rote learning.”
“Large fractions of these students demonstrate their ability to extrapolate from what they know and apply their knowledge very creatively in novel situations,” he said.
一句話﹕孩子的教育不能等啊
--
問君能有幾多愁
恰似一群太監上青樓
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 222.182.103.137
噓
12/10 17:20, , 1F
12/10 17:20, 1F
噓
12/10 17:23, , 2F
12/10 17:23, 2F
噓
12/10 17:25, , 3F
12/10 17:25, 3F
→
12/10 17:30, , 4F
12/10 17:30, 4F
→
12/10 17:41, , 5F
12/10 17:41, 5F
→
12/10 17:41, , 6F
12/10 17:41, 6F
噓
12/10 17:44, , 7F
12/10 17:44, 7F
噓
12/10 17:44, , 8F
12/10 17:44, 8F
→
12/10 17:45, , 9F
12/10 17:45, 9F
噓
12/10 17:45, , 10F
12/10 17:45, 10F
→
12/10 17:45, , 11F
12/10 17:45, 11F
噓
12/10 17:46, , 12F
12/10 17:46, 12F
→
12/10 17:46, , 13F
12/10 17:46, 13F
噓
12/10 17:46, , 14F
12/10 17:46, 14F
→
12/10 17:47, , 15F
12/10 17:47, 15F
→
12/10 17:47, , 16F
12/10 17:47, 16F
噓
12/10 17:47, , 17F
12/10 17:47, 17F
噓
12/10 17:48, , 18F
12/10 17:48, 18F
→
12/10 17:49, , 19F
12/10 17:49, 19F
→
12/10 17:49, , 20F
12/10 17:49, 20F
→
12/10 17:49, , 21F
12/10 17:49, 21F
推
12/10 17:49, , 22F
12/10 17:49, 22F
→
12/10 17:50, , 23F
12/10 17:50, 23F
→
12/10 17:51, , 24F
12/10 17:51, 24F
→
12/10 17:52, , 25F
12/10 17:52, 25F
→
12/10 17:52, , 26F
12/10 17:52, 26F
→
12/10 17:52, , 27F
12/10 17:52, 27F
→
12/10 17:53, , 28F
12/10 17:53, 28F
→
12/10 17:53, , 29F
12/10 17:53, 29F
→
12/10 17:54, , 30F
12/10 17:54, 30F
推
12/10 17:57, , 31F
12/10 17:57, 31F
→
12/10 17:58, , 32F
12/10 17:58, 32F
→
12/10 17:58, , 33F
12/10 17:58, 33F
推
12/10 18:51, , 34F
12/10 18:51, 34F
→
12/11 15:03, , 35F
12/11 15:03, 35F
→
12/11 15:04, , 36F
12/11 15:04, 36F
推
12/11 15:35, , 37F
12/11 15:35, 37F
→
12/11 15:36, , 38F
12/11 15:36, 38F
→
12/11 15:37, , 39F
12/11 15:37, 39F
→
12/11 15:39, , 40F
12/11 15:39, 40F
→
12/11 15:39, , 41F
12/11 15:39, 41F
→
12/11 15:42, , 42F
12/11 15:42, 42F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 4 篇):