[新聞] 前牧師使用大麻並與未成年性交易

看板Christianity作者 (post-neo)時間9年前 (2014/09/26 00:07), 編輯推噓2(2推 0噓 103→)
留言105則, 6人參與, 最新討論串1/1
使用毒品 性交易 與未成年發生性關係 一個牧師 竟然玩那麼大 不知道新店某主任牧師 知道有牧師那麼會玩 心裡不知道情何以堪 以前的受害者在FB上面PO文就嚇得讓他關版一陣子 看到別的牧師這樣 應該可以大大方方的玩吧 http://www.newsherald.com/news/crime-public-safety/panama-city-beach-pastor-markus-bishop-charged-with-two-felonies-1.377355 The former pastor of a Panama City Beach church is in jail again after allegedly giving a 16-year-old marijuana and then forcing sexual advances upon the minor, according to court documents. Markus Quin Bishop, 54, was arrested Tuesday and charged with delivering a controlled substance to a minor and felony battery. The charges stem from a Sept. 11 incident when Bishop and the minor were alone at his Fox Run Boulevard home, according to police. Bishop also was charged with contributing to the delinquency of a minor. Attorneys for Bishop said that because he is a longstanding member of the community, he should have a bond of $17,500. But during his first appearance Wednesday prosecutors argued Bishop’s prior conviction for domestic battery demanded a larger bond, which was set at $35,000. --- ARREST AFFIDAVIT --- On Sept. 11, Bishop allegedly provided the minor with marijuana in an attempt to intoxicate her before professing his love and kissing her against her will, according to his arrest affidavit. The two were at Bishop’s home alone when he offered marijuana to the minor before suggesting they go swimming, investigators with the Bay County Sheriff’s Office reported. “The victim/child said she was extremely ‘high’ but agreed,” their report stated. According to police reports, the minor became uncomfortable with Bishop’s advances in the hot tub and exited, so he suggested they get in the pool. After moving from the hot tub to the pool, Bishop took a flotation device from the minor and placed his hands on her lower back, guiding her around the pool, investigators reported. -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.121.12.188 ※ 文章網址: http://www.ptt.cc/bbs/Christianity/M.1411661272.A.96E.html
→
09/26 00:20, , 1F
這只讓我知道人的全然敗壞，警惕我要更依靠耶穌基督。
09/26 00:20, 1F
→
09/26 00:21, , 2F
責備以及公義就留給有上帝所賜於權柄的人去實行吧。
09/26 00:21, 2F
推
09/26 00:23, , 3F
我每次都覺得你的文章不知從何看起，很難閱讀。
09/26 00:23, 3F
→
09/26 01:44, , 4F
這種文發不完...
09/26 01:44, 4F
→
09/26 06:44, , 5F
知道了人的全然敗壞，卻相信被人傳抄及撿選過的聖經？
09/26 06:44, 5F
→
09/26 07:12, , 6F
基督徒的聖經之本體論預設是，三一真神並道成肉身的基督，
09/26 07:12, 6F
→
09/26 07:12, , 7F
聖經是這位造物主與恩約之主啟示的，是存在的，是可信的，
09/26 07:12, 7F
→
09/26 07:13, , 8F
若沒有祂所啟示的聖經人連自己全然敗壞都不知道。
09/26 07:13, 8F
→
09/26 09:59, , 9F
「最初的」聖經是神所啟示的，是可信的，這我沒意見...
09/26 09:59, 9F
→
09/26 10:00, , 10F
但很不幸的是「現在的」聖經是經過全然敗壞的人所傳抄，被全
09/26 10:00, 10F
→
09/26 10:00, , 11F
然敗壞的人所撿選過，根本就不是「最初的」聖經....
09/26 10:00, 11F
→
09/26 10:03, , 12F
所以請別用「最初的」聖經可信來企圖掩蓋「現在的」聖經有疑
09/26 10:03, 12F
→
09/26 10:04, , 13F
慮的事實，掩蓋錯誤、假裝問題不存在只會讓你遠離上帝而已
09/26 10:04, 13F
→
09/26 11:26, , 14F
通常這時候會搬出聖靈與我們同在保守住聖經之類的～XD
09/26 11:26, 14F
→
09/26 11:37, , 15F
然後我就會說亞當在上帝的眼皮子底下被魔鬼誘惑...^^"
09/26 11:37, 15F
→
09/26 14:56, , 16F
XS的上帝好像是個無能為力有限的上帝。
09/26 14:56, 16F
→
09/26 14:56, , 17F
人的忿怒要成全你的榮美；人的餘怒，你要禁止。(詩 76:10)
09/26 14:56, 17F
→
09/26 14:56, , 18F
人的悖逆仍然能夠達成神良善的心意，
09/26 14:56, 18F
→
09/26 14:56, , 19F
即使他們本沒有這種想法。
09/26 14:56, 19F
→
09/26 14:56, , 20F
回到聖經的「抄本、譯本」。你說「根本不是底本聖經」，
09/26 14:56, 20F
→
09/26 14:56, , 21F
是說：底本跟抄翻本內容 0% 相同嗎？
09/26 14:56, 21F
→
09/26 14:57, , 22F
你似乎是研究抄本鑑別學的專家，竟敢如此斷言？
09/26 14:57, 22F
→
09/26 15:06, , 23F
新福音派都只能說「聖經有部分有誤」，XS大似乎更高竿？
09/26 15:06, 23F
→
09/26 17:10, , 24F
無能為力有限的上帝？NONONO，我認為祂是那種不會把小孩當傀
09/26 17:10, 24F
→
09/26 17:12, , 25F
儡的開明父母，祂會教導我們一切應該知道的道理，但路要怎麼
09/26 17:12, 25F
→
09/26 17:13, , 26F
走？他不干涉，由我們自己決定，後果也由我們自己去扛，當然
09/26 17:13, 26F
→
09/26 17:14, , 27F
是無能為力的意思
09/26 17:14, 27F
→
09/26 17:14, , 28F
當我們真心地認錯了之後，祂也會慈祥地幫助我們收拾善後...
09/26 17:14, 28F
→
09/26 17:16, , 29F
至於聖經的版本？要不你拿本「最初的」聖經來反駁我一下？
09/26 17:16, 29F
→
09/26 17:18, , 30F
後果由自己扛 vs 有人幫忙善後 怎麼才隔幾句說法就不一
09/26 17:18, 30F
→
09/26 17:18, , 31F
還有我哪個字說了 0% 相同？我只說「現在的」聖經根本就不是
09/26 17:18, 31F
→
09/26 17:19, , 32F
「最初的」聖經而已好嗎？
09/26 17:19, 32F
→
09/26 17:20, , 33F
我有說有人要幫時不能接受幫忙嗎？
09/26 17:20, 33F
→
09/26 17:21, , 34F
沒人幫時，後果自己扛啊！神要幫時，自然可以幫你善後啊！
09/26 17:21, 34F
→
09/26 17:22, , 35F
接受幫忙是干涉還是不干涉啊@@
09/26 17:22, 35F
→
09/26 17:23, , 36F
你真心認錯了，你請求神的幫助，神自然會安排讓你好好地彌補
09/26 17:23, 36F
→
09/26 17:24, , 37F
你的過失，這不是他強加在你身上的「干涉」，而是應你的請求
09/26 17:24, 37F
→
09/26 17:24, , 38F
伸出的援手....
09/26 17:24, 38F
→
09/26 17:24, , 39F
那就是干涉的意思啊
09/26 17:24, 39F
還有 26 則推文
→
09/26 17:43, , 66F
這就是我心中的上帝，人不高於世間萬物，什麼神選啦！不過就
09/26 17:43, 66F
→
09/26 17:43, , 67F
就是不處理囉?
09/26 17:43, 67F
→
09/26 17:43, , 68F
是人自以為是、莫名奇妙的自我感覺良好而已
09/26 17:43, 68F
→
09/26 17:44, , 69F
也就是不會愛人 不會恨人 更不會為誰特定做某事,
09/26 17:44, 69F
→
09/26 17:45, , 70F
所以說什麼認錯會得到上帝幫助 也當然是自我感覺良好
09/26 17:45, 70F
→
09/26 17:45, , 71F
他為什麼要用「神蹟」處理？該給人的都已經在世界上了，不需
09/26 17:45, 71F
→
09/26 17:45, , 72F
要他再多做些什麼神蹟了....
09/26 17:45, 72F
→
09/26 17:45, , 73F
什麼"應你的請求伸出援手"更是種自以為的腦補
09/26 17:45, 73F
→
09/26 17:46, , 74F
也就是不處理的意思 有和沒有牠都是一樣的
09/26 17:46, 74F
→
09/26 17:46, , 75F
NO！認錯會得到上帝幫助，幫助你心情穩定，意志堅強，只要你
09/26 17:46, 75F
→
09/26 17:47, , 76F
還同時"處理"呢 XDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD
09/26 17:47, 76F
→
09/26 17:48, , 77F
做錯後願意認錯，有努力悔改，「天助自助者」，了解嗎？
09/26 17:48, 77F
→
09/26 17:48, , 78F
唉 一下說不需要他做什麼事,一下又說他會處理 你好矛盾
09/26 17:48, 78F
→
09/26 17:48, , 79F
天助自助者 早已被你自己那句"天地不仁"打臉了
09/26 17:48, 79F
→
09/26 17:49, , 80F
喂！我講的是「可以」同時處理，請不要掐頭去尾...
09/26 17:49, 80F
→
09/26 17:49, , 81F
是不需要他「再多」做什麼事，因為一切都已經安排好了啊！
09/26 17:49, 81F
→
09/26 17:50, , 82F
還有，真的不要再偷我的字了....
09/26 17:50, 82F
→
09/26 17:50, , 83F
別人能不能同時處理 好像不是你能決定的
09/26 17:50, 83F
→
09/26 17:51, , 84F
一切已安排好了? 飛機失事的人表示:
09/26 17:51, 84F
→
09/26 17:51, , 85F
天地不仁是說沒有特別關愛而已，沒說不幫忙啊！那來的打臉？
09/26 17:51, 85F
→
09/26 17:51, , 86F
好像也不是你能決定的....
09/26 17:51, 86F
→
09/26 17:52, , 87F
沒有特別關愛難民 當然也不會特別關愛其他情況的人啊
09/26 17:52, 87F
→
09/26 17:53, , 88F
既然都沒有特別關愛 天助自助者當然就是自以為的腦補
09/26 17:53, 88F
→
09/26 17:54, , 89F
表示什麼啊？他們不該有這種命運嗎？
09/26 17:54, 89F
→
09/26 17:56, , 90F
當難民努力用正確方式求生，他們會得到最大的生存機率；當人
09/26 17:56, 90F
→
09/26 17:57, , 91F
真心悔改，努力用正確的方式改過，就會有最大機率獲救，沒有
09/26 17:57, 91F
→
09/26 17:58, , 92F
特別關愛啊！都是你的意志決定你成功獲救的機率啊！
09/26 17:58, 92F
→
09/26 18:43, , 93F
原來XS大的上帝根本不是基督教的上帝，
09/26 18:43, 93F
→
09/26 18:43, , 94F
這大概是XS大的上帝觀：
09/26 18:43, 94F
→
09/26 18:43, , 95F
Religion, at least the Christian,
09/26 18:43, 95F
→
09/26 18:44, , 96F
is the relation of man to himself, or more correctly
09/26 18:44, 96F
→
09/26 18:44, , 97F
to his own nature (i.e., his subjective nature);
09/26 18:44, 97F
→
09/26 18:48, , 98F
『XSZX: 賣弄腦中預設的上帝？對啊！人是上帝締造的』
09/26 18:48, 98F
→
09/26 18:52, , 99F
這樣XS大的「底本 "根本" 不是抄譯本」，
09/26 18:52, 99F
→
09/26 18:53, , 100F
不管這個 "根本" 是0%、10％、30%、、都不重要了，
09/26 18:53, 100F
→
09/26 18:53, , 101F
反正XS大的預設就是不相信聖經所啟示的上帝，
09/26 18:53, 101F
→
09/26 18:53, , 102F
只相信自己的本性投射的上帝，
09/26 18:53, 102F
→
09/26 18:53, , 103F
直接地說，與其談論上帝，不如談論人類學吧。
09/26 18:53, 103F
→
09/26 18:54, , 104F
P.S：所以我說「0% 相同」後面有加個問號嘛！沒有斷言之意
09/26 18:54, 104F
推
09/26 19:53, , 105F
S大那句把Christian 改為 Buddhist 就是正解
09/26 19:53, 105F
‣ 更多 pipiboy1980 的文章
文章代碼(AID): #1K93tObk (Christianity)