Re: [討論] 如何看待奧坎剃刀-解釋的簡潔與健全性
※ 引述《jerryen (肚咕求睡)》之銘言：
: 我是沒時間仔細看你給的資料啦
: 不過就拿第一篇來說
: 直接看conclusion,請問下面哪一句告訴大家
: 該作者提出的假設是被證實的
: 另外你說神在理性上不存在，請問你有任何觀點可以證明神在理性上不存在嗎?
: 這篇文章最有趣的地方就是
: His work raises the prospect that we are programmed to believe in god, that
: faith is a mental ability humans have developed or been given.
: 如果人天生就被設計出來人是要相信神的，如果神不存在，為什麼要有這樣的設計?
: 如果依照演化論來解釋就更好笑了，這樣的論點反而說明經過N年的演化，神是存在的!
: 因為如果神不存在，這樣的設計自然會被淘汰掉!
j大應該說的應該是來自唐崇榮牧師的演講吧
我剛好有找到那次的影音
在這裡給大家分享一下
http://tw.youtube.com/watch?v=-e4eSGSY_yQ&feature=related
: 簡而言之，這篇的文章告訴大家的重點就是，相信神比較好，最少比較長壽
: ------
: Religious evolution
: If brain function offers insight into how we experience religion, does it say
: anything about why we do? There is evidence that people with religious faith
: have longer, healthier lives. This hints at a survival benefit for religious
: people. Could we have evolved religious belief?
: Prof Dawkins (who subscribes to evolution to explain human development)
: thinks there could be an evolutionary advantage, not to believing in god, but
: to having a brain with the capacity to believe in god. That such faith exists
: is a by-product of enhanced intelligence. Prof Ramachandran denies that
: finding out how the brain reacts to religion negates the value of belief. He
: feels that brain circuitry like that Persinger and Newberg have identified,
: could amount to an antenna to make us receptive to god. Bishop Sykes
: meanwhile, thinks religion has nothing to fear from this neuroscience.
: Science is about seeking to explain the world around us. For him at least, it
: can co-exist with faith.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 118.168.6.72
推
08/20 00:10, , 1F
08/20 00:10, 1F
討論串 (同標題文章)
本文引述了以下文章的的內容：
完整討論串 (本文為第 14 之 21 篇)：