Re: [新聞] 蘭陵王偷加三場吻戲 占林依晨便宜?
※ 引述《girl10319 (凱莉)》之銘言:
: 蘭陵王偷加三場吻戲 占林依晨便宜?
: 【壹電視報導】
: 古裝劇蘭陵王在兩岸爆紅,男女主角愛得纏綿悱惻,讓戲迷跟著揪心,但壹週刊報導,原
: 來親密吻戲,有三度是飾演蘭陵王的馮紹峰自己偷加戲,佔林依晨便宜。也爆出,馮紹峰
: 有大頭症,不但慣性遲到,而且意見很多,身為監製的他後期檔期喬不攏,主視覺宣傳品
: 只好用替身代打合成,更藉口一堆不肯來台宣傳,下個月為了幫電影打片才順道來台,讓
: 劇組不滿,林依晨上節目也曾爆料,馮紹峰演累了,就會監製上身,大喊,我是製片為什
: 麼這個通告排那麼累,但要找他開製作會議時,他就又說他是專業演員,明天班很多很累
: 推辭,不過劇組表示,林依晨只是在開玩笑,因為感情很好,才會這樣虧他。
: http://www.nexttv.com.tw/news/realtime/entertainment/10826671/
這篇報導感覺讓人不快耶!果然是垃圾霉體,都不求證就亂湊一通。
製作方到底是看馮哪裡不爽?怎麼有辦法一而再再而三的拼命黑馮阿?是因為他紅還是他脾氣太溫和,所以製作方就可以肆意的黑演員?
馮拍十年多的戲,就屬這部被黑最慘吧!我想……
前幾篇的新聞也說他是因為趕拍電影才沒辦法來台宣傳,馮其實很想來台,也允諾台灣見了,怎麼到了這篇,卻變成他只是為了電影才順道來台?前後說法也差太多
至於加吻戲,吻戲的部份幾乎都是書裡有的,何來加吻戲一說阿?如果真的是馮自己加吻戲佔依晨便宜,那戲外的戶動怎麼可能還會這麼好?(而且也加太少了吧!)(喂)
再來依晨的訪談,明明就玩笑話,居然也被扭曲……拜託不要搞到讓他倆無法在合作的地步好嗎?
真的是讓人氣憤的一篇,製作方都不檢討,只會一昧的怪演員 黑演員,難怪會寫出太鄭如此無言的戲碼!!!
--
Sent from my Android
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 27.245.185.168
推
09/11 12:40, , 1F
09/11 12:40, 1F
→
09/11 12:41, , 2F
09/11 12:41, 2F
推
09/11 12:42, , 3F
09/11 12:42, 3F
推
09/11 12:49, , 4F
09/11 12:49, 4F
推
09/11 12:50, , 5F
09/11 12:50, 5F
→
09/11 12:51, , 6F
09/11 12:51, 6F
→
09/11 12:51, , 7F
09/11 12:51, 7F
推
09/11 12:56, , 8F
09/11 12:56, 8F
→
09/11 12:57, , 9F
09/11 12:57, 9F
→
09/11 12:58, , 10F
09/11 12:58, 10F
推
09/11 12:59, , 11F
09/11 12:59, 11F
→
09/11 13:01, , 12F
09/11 13:01, 12F
→
09/11 13:01, , 13F
09/11 13:01, 13F
推
09/11 13:03, , 14F
09/11 13:03, 14F
→
09/11 13:04, , 15F
09/11 13:04, 15F
→
09/11 13:04, , 16F
09/11 13:04, 16F
推
09/11 13:06, , 17F
09/11 13:06, 17F
→
09/11 13:07, , 18F
09/11 13:07, 18F
推
09/11 13:11, , 19F
09/11 13:11, 19F
推
09/11 13:12, , 20F
09/11 13:12, 20F
→
09/11 13:12, , 21F
09/11 13:12, 21F
推
09/11 13:30, , 22F
09/11 13:30, 22F
→
09/11 13:32, , 23F
09/11 13:32, 23F
推
09/11 13:34, , 24F
09/11 13:34, 24F
→
09/11 13:40, , 25F
09/11 13:40, 25F
推
09/11 13:42, , 26F
09/11 13:42, 26F
推
09/11 13:43, , 27F
09/11 13:43, 27F
推
09/11 13:43, , 28F
09/11 13:43, 28F
→
09/11 13:44, , 29F
09/11 13:44, 29F
推
09/11 13:45, , 30F
09/11 13:45, 30F
→
09/11 13:45, , 31F
09/11 13:45, 31F
→
09/11 13:46, , 32F
09/11 13:46, 32F
推
09/11 13:47, , 33F
09/11 13:47, 33F
→
09/11 13:47, , 34F
09/11 13:47, 34F
推
09/11 13:47, , 35F
09/11 13:47, 35F
推
09/11 13:47, , 36F
09/11 13:47, 36F
推
09/11 13:48, , 37F
09/11 13:48, 37F
推
09/11 13:52, , 38F
09/11 13:52, 38F
推
09/11 13:54, , 39F
09/11 13:54, 39F
推
09/11 13:56, , 40F
09/11 13:56, 40F
推
09/11 13:59, , 41F
09/11 13:59, 41F
→
09/11 14:00, , 42F
09/11 14:00, 42F
推
09/11 14:09, , 43F
09/11 14:09, 43F
推
09/11 14:17, , 44F
09/11 14:17, 44F
推
09/11 14:32, , 45F
09/11 14:32, 45F
→
09/11 14:32, , 46F
09/11 14:32, 46F
→
09/11 14:56, , 47F
09/11 14:56, 47F
推
09/11 14:58, , 48F
09/11 14:58, 48F
推
09/11 15:31, , 49F
09/11 15:31, 49F
推
09/11 15:35, , 50F
09/11 15:35, 50F
推
09/11 15:39, , 51F
09/11 15:39, 51F
→
09/11 16:30, , 52F
09/11 16:30, 52F
推
09/11 16:31, , 53F
09/11 16:31, 53F
→
09/11 17:19, , 54F
09/11 17:19, 54F
推
09/11 17:20, , 55F
09/11 17:20, 55F
→
09/11 17:24, , 56F
09/11 17:24, 56F
推
09/11 17:26, , 57F
09/11 17:26, 57F
→
09/11 17:27, , 58F
09/11 17:27, 58F
→
09/11 17:27, , 59F
09/11 17:27, 59F
→
09/11 17:28, , 60F
09/11 17:28, 60F
→
09/11 17:29, , 61F
09/11 17:29, 61F
→
09/11 17:30, , 62F
09/11 17:30, 62F
→
09/11 17:30, , 63F
09/11 17:30, 63F
→
09/11 17:31, , 64F
09/11 17:31, 64F
→
09/11 17:32, , 65F
09/11 17:32, 65F
→
09/11 17:32, , 66F
09/11 17:32, 66F
推
09/11 18:44, , 67F
09/11 18:44, 67F
→
09/11 18:45, , 68F
09/11 18:45, 68F
→
09/11 18:45, , 69F
09/11 18:45, 69F
→
09/11 18:45, , 70F
09/11 18:45, 70F
→
09/11 18:46, , 71F
09/11 18:46, 71F
→
09/11 19:11, , 72F
09/11 19:11, 72F
推
09/11 19:19, , 73F
09/11 19:19, 73F
推
09/11 19:54, , 74F
09/11 19:54, 74F
推
09/11 22:17, , 75F
09/11 22:17, 75F
→
09/11 22:18, , 76F
09/11 22:18, 76F
推
09/11 22:43, , 77F
09/11 22:43, 77F
→
11/28 03:21,
5年前
, 78F
11/28 03:21, 78F
討論串 (同標題文章)
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):