[討論] 輸球關鍵
不知道為什麼,我覺得塞爾提克輸球是因為他們太老了,所以在第四節命中率嚴重下滑
有沒有誰知道哪裡可以查塞爾提克每節分開的數據啊
如果有的話,第四節應該會很明顯命中率下滑才對
其實第三節塞爾提克就已經有點露出疲態,靠著Rondo最後連得七分,才維持住平手
另外我以為在LBJ投進一顆大號三分球,把比數擴大到七分差之後
Ray Allen想要還以顏色,立刻搶投三分球有點太過急躁
之後Allen又嘗試一次三分球,還是沒進,後來塞隊幾次三分球也都沒投中
感覺塞爾提克在最後關頭搶投三分球屢屢失敗,也是輸球的原因
根據我手邊的資料,塞爾提克三分球命中率平均只有28.7
雖然我的程度應該比塞爾提克教練或球員差很多,
我還是會覺得塞爾提克就算剩三分鐘差距九分,也應該兩分兩分慢慢追比較有機會
當然因為體能下滑守不住熱火進攻,也可能是賭三分球的原因
只能說現行的賽制,對於年紀較大體能較差的球隊,就是比較不利,特別是打到第七戰
而且上一輪打七六人也是打到第七戰
不知道NBA每節十二分鐘這種長度是怎麼訂出來的
假如是每節十分鐘,也許贏球的就是塞爾提克了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc)
◆ From: 140.112.218.166
→
06/10 11:53, , 1F
06/10 11:53, 1F
推
06/10 11:53, , 2F
06/10 11:53, 2F
※ 編輯: earh 來自: 140.112.218.166 (06/10 11:53)
→
06/10 11:53, , 3F
06/10 11:53, 3F
推
06/10 11:54, , 4F
06/10 11:54, 4F
→
06/10 11:55, , 5F
06/10 11:55, 5F
推
06/10 11:55, , 6F
06/10 11:55, 6F
→
06/10 11:55, , 7F
06/10 11:55, 7F
→
06/10 11:55, , 8F
06/10 11:55, 8F
推
06/10 11:56, , 9F
06/10 11:56, 9F
→
06/10 11:56, , 10F
06/10 11:56, 10F
推
06/10 11:56, , 11F
06/10 11:56, 11F
推
06/10 11:56, , 12F
06/10 11:56, 12F
→
06/10 11:56, , 13F
06/10 11:56, 13F
→
06/10 11:57, , 14F
06/10 11:57, 14F
→
06/10 11:57, , 15F
06/10 11:57, 15F
→
06/10 11:58, , 16F
06/10 11:58, 16F
推
06/10 11:59, , 17F
06/10 11:59, 17F
推
06/10 11:59, , 18F
06/10 11:59, 18F
→
06/10 11:59, , 19F
06/10 11:59, 19F
→
06/10 11:59, , 20F
06/10 11:59, 20F
→
06/10 11:59, , 21F
06/10 11:59, 21F
推
06/10 12:00, , 22F
06/10 12:00, 22F
→
06/10 12:01, , 23F
06/10 12:01, 23F
→
06/10 12:01, , 24F
06/10 12:01, 24F
→
06/10 12:01, , 25F
06/10 12:01, 25F
推
06/10 12:01, , 26F
06/10 12:01, 26F
推
06/10 12:01, , 27F
06/10 12:01, 27F
→
06/10 12:02, , 28F
06/10 12:02, 28F
推
06/10 12:03, , 29F
06/10 12:03, 29F
→
06/10 12:03, , 30F
06/10 12:03, 30F
→
06/10 12:04, , 31F
06/10 12:04, 31F
→
06/10 12:04, , 32F
06/10 12:04, 32F
→
06/10 12:05, , 33F
06/10 12:05, 33F
推
06/10 12:08, , 34F
06/10 12:08, 34F
→
06/10 12:08, , 35F
06/10 12:08, 35F
→
06/10 12:09, , 36F
06/10 12:09, 36F
推
06/10 12:09, , 37F
06/10 12:09, 37F
推
06/10 12:10, , 38F
06/10 12:10, 38F
推
06/10 12:10, , 39F
06/10 12:10, 39F
推
06/10 12:11, , 40F
06/10 12:11, 40F
→
06/10 12:11, , 41F
06/10 12:11, 41F
→
06/10 12:12, , 42F
06/10 12:12, 42F
推
06/10 12:12, , 43F
06/10 12:12, 43F
→
06/10 12:12, , 44F
06/10 12:12, 44F
推
06/10 12:12, , 45F
06/10 12:12, 45F
噓
06/10 12:12, , 46F
06/10 12:12, 46F
推
06/10 12:12, , 47F
06/10 12:12, 47F
→
06/10 12:12, , 48F
06/10 12:12, 48F
推
06/10 12:12, , 49F
06/10 12:12, 49F
→
06/10 12:12, , 50F
06/10 12:12, 50F
→
06/10 12:13, , 51F
06/10 12:13, 51F
→
06/10 12:13, , 52F
06/10 12:13, 52F
推
06/10 12:14, , 53F
06/10 12:14, 53F
→
06/10 12:14, , 54F
06/10 12:14, 54F
→
06/10 12:14, , 55F
06/10 12:14, 55F
→
06/10 12:14, , 56F
06/10 12:14, 56F
→
06/10 12:14, , 57F
06/10 12:14, 57F
→
06/10 12:15, , 58F
06/10 12:15, 58F
→
06/10 12:15, , 59F
06/10 12:15, 59F
→
06/10 12:15, , 60F
06/10 12:15, 60F
→
06/10 12:16, , 61F
06/10 12:16, 61F
推
06/10 12:16, , 62F
06/10 12:16, 62F
推
06/10 12:16, , 63F
06/10 12:16, 63F
→
06/10 12:17, , 64F
06/10 12:17, 64F
推
06/10 12:17, , 65F
06/10 12:17, 65F
→
06/10 12:17, , 66F
06/10 12:17, 66F
推
06/10 12:19, , 67F
06/10 12:19, 67F
→
06/10 12:19, , 68F
06/10 12:19, 68F
推
06/10 12:20, , 69F
06/10 12:20, 69F
推
06/10 12:20, , 70F
06/10 12:20, 70F
推
06/10 12:22, , 71F
06/10 12:22, 71F
推
06/10 12:22, , 72F
06/10 12:22, 72F
推
06/10 12:22, , 73F
06/10 12:22, 73F
推
06/10 12:22, , 74F
06/10 12:22, 74F
→
06/10 12:24, , 75F
06/10 12:24, 75F
推
06/10 12:38, , 76F
06/10 12:38, 76F
→
06/10 12:41, , 77F
06/10 12:41, 77F
推
06/10 12:43, , 78F
06/10 12:43, 78F
推
06/10 12:48, , 79F
06/10 12:48, 79F
推
06/10 13:00, , 80F
06/10 13:00, 80F
噓
06/10 13:15, , 81F
06/10 13:15, 81F
推
06/10 13:57, , 82F
06/10 13:57, 82F
推
06/10 14:10, , 83F
06/10 14:10, 83F
推
06/10 21:30, , 84F
06/10 21:30, 84F
討論串 (同標題文章)