[閒聊] 電子遊戲的結局是這樣的

看板C_Chat作者LABOYS (洛城浪子)時間1天前 (2025/12/21 13:30)推噓16(16推 0噓 12→)

留言28則, 18人參與討論串1/1

https://x.com/ShitpostRock/status/2002277034752356372 Average videogame endings https://pbs.twimg.com/media/G8k_rCoX0AA8oeg.jpg

i like the - play quick or shitty = bad ending normal playthrough = good ending do everything, sidequests, companionquests etc. etc. = true ending. 我喜歡那種設計── 隨便速通或亂玩＝壞結局正常流程通關＝好結局把所有事情都做完，支線任務、同伴任務等等＝真結局 I actually like best/true ending hard to earn and get. Japan perfected this design since 80s. Notable Western developed game that did this particular thing well was PoS:Warrior Within in recent memory. 其實我很喜歡那種「最佳／真結局」很難達成、必須付出努力才能拿到的設計。日本從 80 年代開始就把這種做法打磨到近乎完美。近年的西方遊戲裡，少數把這一點做得很好的例子是《波斯王子：侍魂無雙》。 I hate “true endings” or “good ending” in game that requires you to do convoluted nonsense to acquire them or replay the game 我很討厭那種必須做一堆莫名其妙、繞遠路的事情，或是被迫重玩整個遊戲，才能拿到的「真結局」或「好結局」。 Casual playthrough = depression. Wiki walkthrough = happiness. 隨便玩一輪＝悲劇。照著攻略跑＝快樂。 I’ve gotten over it but when I initially beat The Witcher 3 I got the bad ending and it made me hate the game so much that I wouldn’t touch it again for 2 years. 我後來放下了，但第一次破《巫師 3》時選到的是壞結局，氣到我對這遊戲恨之入骨，整整兩年都不想再碰它。 And then the "True Ending" is exactly the same, except you have to change one tiny decision on a random part of the story or else you're locked out of it for that play through 結果發現「真結局」的完成方式和普通結局幾乎九成像，只是必須在故事中某個超不起眼的地方改正一個微不足道的選擇，不然那一輪就直接被鎖死拿不到。 Far Cry games: Bad Ending: Play the game normally Good Ending: Just don’t play lol 《極地戰嚎》系列是這樣的：壞結局：正常遊玩好結局：就是不要玩 lol 古早的遊戲設計思路讓我養成了查戶口和一過故事節點就一定要存檔的強迫症 -- 「胡鐵花，我希望你以後知道，世上的女孩子，並不是每個都像高亞男那麼好對付的，你覺得高亞男好對付，只因為她喜歡你。」「不錯，從今以後，我再不敢說我會對付女人了，我現在簡直恨不得跪在高亞男面前，去嗅她的腳。」《楚留香傳奇‧大沙漠》 -- ※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.41.210.210 (臺灣) ※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1766295025.A.24F.html

推

gaym19

12/21 13:32, 1天前 , 1^F

12/21 13:32, 1^F

推

shadowblade

12/21 13:33, 1天前 , 2^F

12/21 13:33, 2^F

推

wedman

12/21 13:33, 1天前 , 3^F

12/21 13:33, 3^F