[討論] 全員覺醒,有成熟戰術的湘北是否無敵?已回收
認真討論
有看過山王之戰的都知道
湘北到了下半場,赤木跟流川才真正覺醒
也才開始有了成熟的戰術體系
在以前,湘北根本只是一支自己打自己的隊伍
有危機? 球給赤木,赤木跳出來carry
有危險? 球給我,我流川自己來
三井則是有空檔接到球就投,沒接到就發呆
山王之戰下半場,赤木終於醒悟,湘北並不需要他當得分主力,湘北缺的是苦力,他只需要專心幹髒活
醒過來的他,開始懂得掩護、擋拆製造空檔
讓三井能夠舒服的接球、投球
自此,湘北才真正成為一個緊密分工合作有戰術的球隊
接著流川的覺醒,讓湘北進入更高的層次
原先的體系進攻點太單薄,但是當流川懂得傳球時,他們整個球隊就活起來了
流川持球時,就可以選擇自己進攻、傳給籃下的赤木或者給外線,無形中也為三井製造了空檔
假如湘北打從一開始就有這種戰術體系,以流川跟三井為核心,赤木 櫻木 宮城輔助,這支球隊是否無敵?
湘北這體系跟勇士是不是有87%相像?
-----
Sent from JPTT on my HTC_D530u.
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 42.73.59.54
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1505558678.A.225.html
推
09/16 18:49, , 1F
09/16 18:49, 1F
推
09/16 18:49, , 2F
09/16 18:49, 2F
推
09/16 18:51, , 3F
09/16 18:51, 3F
→
09/16 18:51, , 4F
09/16 18:51, 4F
推
09/16 18:52, , 5F
09/16 18:52, 5F
推
09/16 18:53, , 6F
09/16 18:53, 6F
→
09/16 18:53, , 7F
09/16 18:53, 7F
→
09/16 18:54, , 8F
09/16 18:54, 8F
推
09/16 18:54, , 9F
09/16 18:54, 9F
→
09/16 18:54, , 10F
09/16 18:54, 10F
推
09/16 18:54, , 11F
09/16 18:54, 11F
推
09/16 18:56, , 12F
09/16 18:56, 12F
→
09/16 18:57, , 13F
09/16 18:57, 13F
推
09/16 18:58, , 14F
09/16 18:58, 14F
推
09/16 18:58, , 15F
09/16 18:58, 15F
推
09/16 18:59, , 16F
09/16 18:59, 16F
→
09/16 19:02, , 17F
09/16 19:02, 17F
→
09/16 19:03, , 18F
09/16 19:03, 18F
推
09/16 19:03, , 19F
09/16 19:03, 19F
推
09/16 19:04, , 20F
09/16 19:04, 20F
推
09/16 19:04, , 21F
09/16 19:04, 21F
→
09/16 19:05, , 22F
09/16 19:05, 22F
推
09/16 19:05, , 23F
09/16 19:05, 23F
→
09/16 19:06, , 24F
09/16 19:06, 24F
因為灌籃高手的年代還是一個內線中鋒為主的年代吧0_0 所以湘北這樣的防守能力足以應付吧 如果是更往後的年代,後衛當到人人都能中距離跳投,湘北大概就不行!?
→
09/16 19:06, , 25F
09/16 19:06, 25F
→
09/16 19:06, , 26F
09/16 19:06, 26F
→
09/16 19:07, , 27F
09/16 19:07, 27F
※ 編輯: ccyaztfe (42.73.59.54), 09/16/2017 19:09:43
噓
09/16 19:11, , 28F
09/16 19:11, 28F
推
09/16 19:20, , 29F
09/16 19:20, 29F
推
09/16 19:25, , 30F
09/16 19:25, 30F
→
09/16 19:26, , 31F
09/16 19:26, 31F
推
09/16 19:27, , 32F
09/16 19:27, 32F
→
09/16 19:27, , 33F
09/16 19:27, 33F
→
09/16 19:28, , 34F
09/16 19:28, 34F
→
09/16 19:28, , 35F
09/16 19:28, 35F
→
09/16 19:36, , 36F
09/16 19:36, 36F
→
09/16 19:37, , 37F
09/16 19:37, 37F
推
09/16 19:39, , 38F
09/16 19:39, 38F
推
09/16 19:44, , 39F
09/16 19:44, 39F
推
09/16 19:49, , 40F
09/16 19:49, 40F
推
09/16 19:52, , 41F
09/16 19:52, 41F
→
09/16 20:09, , 42F
09/16 20:09, 42F
→
09/16 20:10, , 43F
09/16 20:10, 43F
→
09/16 20:10, , 44F
09/16 20:10, 44F
推
09/16 20:47, , 45F
09/16 20:47, 45F
推
09/16 20:48, , 46F
09/16 20:48, 46F
→
09/16 20:50, , 47F
09/16 20:50, 47F
推
09/16 21:39, , 48F
09/16 21:39, 48F
推
09/16 21:41, , 49F
09/16 21:41, 49F
→
09/16 21:41, , 50F
09/16 21:41, 50F
→
09/16 21:41, , 51F
09/16 21:41, 51F
推
09/16 23:01, , 52F
09/16 23:01, 52F
推
09/17 00:02, , 53F
09/17 00:02, 53F