[閒聊] 有沒有能和境界觸發者一戰的戰鬥漫畫已回收
說到鬥智型的戰鬥漫畫,很多人會想到JoJo和獵人
雖然我也是JoJo的腦粉,但在我心目中境界觸發者屌打上面這兩部
在世界觀的設定上做了很多心思,做出其他漫畫難以達成的效果
人人的身體強度都一樣,戰鬥力五的農夫也能一槍斃了破壞神
絕對不會我砍你你很癢,你揍我我變花京院甜甜圈
戰鬥用的身體不是肉體,可以任意摧殘
場場都打到斷手斷腳斷頭,和一拳超人的傑諾斯原理相同
劇中角色很明確地說了,影響勝負的是實力、戰術還有運氣
執念和氣勢這種東西沒什麼用,不會讓你使用羈絆的力量
最難得的是團體戰的刻劃
不是各自帶開單挑,不是二對二,也不是三對三,而是十人以上的多方混戰
每個人都會對當下的局面做出思考和反應,讓人看得十分過癮
只可惜作者工作到身體出了毛病,無限期休刊中
如今也過了一年了,還沒有任何復刊的跡象
我把漫畫重看了好幾輪,但也快撐不住了
所以請問各位,有沒有能和境界觸發者一戰的作品?
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 150.117.220.167
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1505096713.A.234.html
推
09/11 10:31, , 1F
09/11 10:31, 1F
性質不同 而且只有佐藤能看
→
09/11 10:32, , 2F
09/11 10:32, 2F
→
09/11 10:32, , 3F
09/11 10:32, 3F
→
09/11 10:34, , 4F
09/11 10:34, 4F
推
09/11 10:36, , 5F
09/11 10:36, 5F
推
09/11 10:37, , 6F
09/11 10:37, 6F
推
09/11 10:40, , 7F
09/11 10:40, 7F
性質不同 這部在比誰能在複雜到很機歪的規則中找到漏洞
推
09/11 10:40, , 8F
09/11 10:40, 8F
推
09/11 10:41, , 9F
09/11 10:41, 9F
→
09/11 10:41, , 10F
09/11 10:41, 10F
推
09/11 10:42, , 11F
09/11 10:42, 11F
推
09/11 10:47, , 12F
09/11 10:47, 12F
遊真反殺無敵老人燃爆 三輪反殺兩個黑觸發燃爆 風刃拔出來燃爆
推
09/11 10:52, , 13F
09/11 10:52, 13F
推
09/11 10:52, , 14F
09/11 10:52, 14F
→
09/11 10:54, , 15F
09/11 10:54, 15F
推
09/11 10:57, , 16F
09/11 10:57, 16F
推
09/11 11:04, , 17F
09/11 11:04, 17F
推
09/11 11:07, , 18F
09/11 11:07, 18F
隊伍上限是戰鬥員四人+操作員一人
嵐山隊、三輪隊、生駒隊都是滿額
反例是B級的漆間隊,只有戰鬥員一人+操作員一人
推
09/11 11:09, , 19F
09/11 11:09, 19F
→
09/11 11:09, , 20F
09/11 11:09, 20F
※ 編輯: Wolfclaw (150.117.220.167), 09/11/2017 11:18:13
推
09/11 11:12, , 21F
09/11 11:12, 21F
→
09/11 11:14, , 22F
09/11 11:14, 22F
→
09/11 11:15, , 23F
09/11 11:15, 23F
推
09/11 11:26, , 24F
09/11 11:26, 24F
推
09/11 11:29, , 25F
09/11 11:29, 25F
→
09/11 11:30, , 26F
09/11 11:30, 26F
→
09/11 11:33, , 27F
09/11 11:33, 27F
→
09/11 11:33, , 28F
09/11 11:33, 28F
推
09/11 11:34, , 29F
09/11 11:34, 29F
→
09/11 11:34, , 30F
09/11 11:34, 30F
→
09/11 11:37, , 31F
09/11 11:37, 31F
→
09/11 11:39, , 32F
09/11 11:39, 32F
推
09/11 11:45, , 33F
09/11 11:45, 33F
推
09/11 11:46, , 34F
09/11 11:46, 34F
→
09/11 12:08, , 35F
09/11 12:08, 35F
噓
09/11 12:25, , 36F
09/11 12:25, 36F
→
09/11 12:25, , 37F
09/11 12:25, 37F
推
09/11 12:26, , 38F
09/11 12:26, 38F
推
09/11 12:33, , 39F
09/11 12:33, 39F
推
09/11 12:37, , 40F
09/11 12:37, 40F
推
09/11 13:10, , 41F
09/11 13:10, 41F
→
09/11 13:10, , 42F
09/11 13:10, 42F
→
09/11 13:10, , 43F
09/11 13:10, 43F
→
09/11 13:10, , 44F
09/11 13:10, 44F
推
09/11 13:24, , 45F
09/11 13:24, 45F
推
09/11 13:41, , 46F
09/11 13:41, 46F
推
09/11 13:43, , 47F
09/11 13:43, 47F
推
09/11 14:04, , 48F
09/11 14:04, 48F
推
09/11 15:37, , 49F
09/11 15:37, 49F
推
09/11 15:41, , 50F
09/11 15:41, 50F
推
09/11 16:17, , 51F
09/11 16:17, 51F
推
09/11 17:02, , 52F
09/11 17:02, 52F
→
09/11 17:28, , 53F
09/11 17:28, 53F
推
09/11 20:46, , 54F
09/11 20:46, 54F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):