Re: [閒聊] 分類帽這個制度是不是不太好?已回收
原文恕刪
分類帽這個制度超鳥,鳥到爆炸。
雖然它的確給學生選擇的權利,但在分配學院之後,刻版印象就會如影隨形的跟著學生;
像是榮恩第一集就說自己不想被分到赫夫帕夫,海格也認為赫夫帕夫的人都是一堆飯桶,
好像赫夫帕夫專出智障一樣(明明這兩位也沒說比較聰明...)
學生的思想本來就很容易受到教育者與同儕的影響,學校應該要想辦法提高老師的素質,
而不是一開始就告訴學生說,這就是你的人格特質,你就應該這樣做,才不會違背學院
對你的期待。
如果奈威被分到赫夫帕夫,還會有人認為他會是一個有勇氣的人嗎?
恐怕不會,大家只會覺得,像奈威這樣的智障活該被分到赫夫帕夫,而忽略奈威其他的
人格特質。
教育制度不可能會做到永遠公平,總是有特定族群的學生較受老師關愛,但至少應該給學
生「不受刻版印象侷限」的教育環境,霍格華茲顯然沒做到這點。
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 27.242.231.100
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1503134519.A.55F.html
→
08/19 17:23, , 1F
08/19 17:23, 1F
推
08/19 17:25, , 2F
08/19 17:25, 2F
推
08/19 17:27, , 3F
08/19 17:27, 3F
推
08/19 17:27, , 4F
08/19 17:27, 4F
推
08/19 17:28, , 5F
08/19 17:28, 5F
→
08/19 17:28, , 6F
08/19 17:28, 6F
推
08/19 17:28, , 7F
08/19 17:28, 7F
→
08/19 17:28, , 8F
08/19 17:28, 8F
→
08/19 17:28, , 9F
08/19 17:28, 9F
→
08/19 17:28, , 10F
08/19 17:28, 10F
→
08/19 17:28, , 11F
08/19 17:28, 11F
→
08/19 17:29, , 12F
08/19 17:29, 12F
→
08/19 17:29, , 13F
08/19 17:29, 13F
推
08/19 17:29, , 14F
08/19 17:29, 14F
→
08/19 17:30, , 15F
08/19 17:30, 15F
→
08/19 17:30, , 16F
08/19 17:30, 16F
→
08/19 17:30, , 17F
08/19 17:30, 17F
→
08/19 17:31, , 18F
08/19 17:31, 18F
推
08/19 17:32, , 19F
08/19 17:32, 19F
→
08/19 17:32, , 20F
08/19 17:32, 20F
→
08/19 17:32, , 21F
08/19 17:32, 21F
推
08/19 17:35, , 22F
08/19 17:35, 22F
→
08/19 17:35, , 23F
08/19 17:35, 23F
→
08/19 17:35, , 24F
08/19 17:35, 24F
→
08/19 17:35, , 25F
08/19 17:35, 25F
推
08/19 17:35, , 26F
08/19 17:35, 26F
→
08/19 17:36, , 27F
08/19 17:36, 27F
→
08/19 17:36, , 28F
08/19 17:36, 28F
→
08/19 17:39, , 29F
08/19 17:39, 29F
→
08/19 17:40, , 30F
08/19 17:40, 30F
→
08/19 17:40, , 31F
08/19 17:40, 31F
→
08/19 17:41, , 32F
08/19 17:41, 32F
→
08/19 17:41, , 33F
08/19 17:41, 33F
→
08/19 17:41, , 34F
08/19 17:41, 34F
推
08/19 17:44, , 35F
08/19 17:44, 35F
→
08/19 17:45, , 36F
08/19 17:45, 36F
推
08/19 17:45, , 37F
08/19 17:45, 37F
推
08/19 17:46, , 38F
08/19 17:46, 38F
→
08/19 17:46, , 39F
08/19 17:46, 39F
推
08/19 17:47, , 40F
08/19 17:47, 40F
→
08/19 17:47, , 41F
08/19 17:47, 41F
→
08/19 17:47, , 42F
08/19 17:47, 42F
→
08/19 17:47, , 43F
08/19 17:47, 43F
推
08/19 17:50, , 44F
08/19 17:50, 44F
→
08/19 17:50, , 45F
08/19 17:50, 45F
推
08/19 17:52, , 46F
08/19 17:52, 46F
→
08/19 17:52, , 47F
08/19 17:52, 47F
→
08/19 17:52, , 48F
08/19 17:52, 48F
→
08/19 17:52, , 49F
08/19 17:52, 49F
推
08/19 17:53, , 50F
08/19 17:53, 50F
推
08/19 17:54, , 51F
08/19 17:54, 51F
→
08/19 17:55, , 52F
08/19 17:55, 52F
推
08/19 17:55, , 53F
08/19 17:55, 53F
推
08/19 17:57, , 54F
08/19 17:57, 54F
→
08/19 17:57, , 55F
08/19 17:57, 55F
推
08/19 17:59, , 56F
08/19 17:59, 56F
→
08/19 18:01, , 57F
08/19 18:01, 57F
推
08/19 18:01, , 58F
08/19 18:01, 58F
→
08/19 18:02, , 59F
08/19 18:02, 59F
推
08/19 18:13, , 60F
08/19 18:13, 60F
→
08/19 18:13, , 61F
08/19 18:13, 61F
推
08/19 18:18, , 62F
08/19 18:18, 62F
→
08/19 18:18, , 63F
08/19 18:18, 63F
→
08/19 18:19, , 64F
08/19 18:19, 64F
推
08/19 18:30, , 65F
08/19 18:30, 65F
→
08/19 18:30, , 66F
08/19 18:30, 66F
推
08/19 18:31, , 67F
08/19 18:31, 67F
→
08/19 18:31, , 68F
08/19 18:31, 68F
噓
08/19 21:43, , 69F
08/19 21:43, 69F
→
08/19 21:43, , 70F
08/19 21:43, 70F
→
08/19 21:44, , 71F
08/19 21:44, 71F
→
08/19 21:45, , 72F
08/19 21:45, 72F
噓
08/19 22:29, , 73F
08/19 22:29, 73F
→
08/19 22:31, , 74F
08/19 22:31, 74F
→
08/19 22:31, , 75F
08/19 22:31, 75F
→
08/19 23:15, , 76F
08/19 23:15, 76F
推
08/19 23:50, , 77F
08/19 23:50, 77F
推
08/20 10:43, , 78F
08/20 10:43, 78F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 4 之 7 篇):