[閒聊] 本傳黃金聖鬥士戰力與冥王版怎差那麼多?已回收
這邊的本傳的黃金聖鬥士指的是星矢等人還是青銅時期闖十二宮的黃金聖鬥士。
剛才在群組有人抱怨冥王神話ova怎麼那麼久沒下文了,於是聊著聊著談到本傳與上代打
冥王戰爭的戰力怎麼好像差太多了?
先不管從上代戰爭倖存跑去隱居的天秤牡羊。
例如上代金牛根本男子漢,不惜自,耳朵來打,戰死前拖了起碼三個冥鬥士(好像有位是
菁英?)下去,這代金牛在五小強闖十二宮時被打斷角就投降了,好像也沒有領悟到金牛座
奧義,這期冥王戰爭也被背叛的黃金聖鬥士先秒殺掉。
還有那位友人舉例上代巨蟹與他師父(前任巨蟹)兩人合作才有收掉黑帝斯底下的兩位從屬
神其一,然而這代..嗯?只記得好像很自戀沒了。前代與前前代最強是獅子座,這代突然
變成了雙子座,獅子下滑到第二
這代的黃金聖鬥士仔細想想好像是闖十二宮時,前期戰力指標,後期變成了超級小兵....
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 101.8.243.20
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1476263276.A.719.html
推
10/12 17:09, , 1F
10/12 17:09, 1F
我記憶錯了啊…
※ 編輯: graywater (101.8.243.20), 10/12/2016 17:10:40
推
10/12 17:11, , 2F
10/12 17:11, 2F
不過記得是小咖,上代起碼抗了個菁英和兩個小角色
推
10/12 17:14, , 3F
10/12 17:14, 3F
推
10/12 17:15, , 4F
10/12 17:15, 4F
推
10/12 17:15, , 5F
10/12 17:15, 5F
我記得看的動畫ova的,要去查一下了
推
10/12 17:18, , 6F
10/12 17:18, 6F
→
10/12 17:18, , 7F
10/12 17:18, 7F
→
10/12 17:19, , 8F
10/12 17:19, 8F
推
10/12 17:19, , 9F
10/12 17:19, 9F
→
10/12 17:19, , 10F
10/12 17:19, 10F
推
10/12 17:20, , 11F
10/12 17:20, 11F
推
10/12 17:21, , 12F
10/12 17:21, 12F
→
10/12 17:21, , 13F
10/12 17:21, 13F
推
10/12 17:23, , 14F
10/12 17:23, 14F
推
10/12 17:23, , 15F
10/12 17:23, 15F
→
10/12 17:23, , 16F
10/12 17:23, 16F
→
10/12 17:24, , 17F
10/12 17:24, 17F
→
10/12 17:24, , 18F
10/12 17:24, 18F
推
10/12 17:24, , 19F
10/12 17:24, 19F
推
10/12 17:27, , 20F
10/12 17:27, 20F
推
10/12 17:28, , 21F
10/12 17:28, 21F
→
10/12 17:28, , 22F
10/12 17:28, 22F
※ 編輯: graywater (101.8.243.20), 10/12/2016 17:32:30
→
10/12 17:33, , 23F
10/12 17:33, 23F
→
10/12 17:34, , 24F
10/12 17:34, 24F
→
10/12 17:34, , 25F
10/12 17:34, 25F
→
10/12 17:35, , 26F
10/12 17:35, 26F
→
10/12 17:37, , 27F
10/12 17:37, 27F
→
10/12 17:38, , 28F
10/12 17:38, 28F
→
10/12 17:39, , 29F
10/12 17:39, 29F
推
10/12 17:49, , 30F
10/12 17:49, 30F
→
10/12 17:49, , 31F
10/12 17:49, 31F
推
10/12 17:55, , 32F
10/12 17:55, 32F
推
10/12 17:57, , 33F
10/12 17:57, 33F
→
10/12 17:57, , 34F
10/12 17:57, 34F
推
10/12 17:57, , 35F
10/12 17:57, 35F
還有 22 則推文
→
10/12 19:54, , 58F
10/12 19:54, 58F
推
10/12 19:54, , 59F
10/12 19:54, 59F
→
10/12 19:55, , 60F
10/12 19:55, 60F
推
10/12 19:56, , 61F
10/12 19:56, 61F
推
10/12 19:58, , 62F
10/12 19:58, 62F
推
10/12 20:03, , 63F
10/12 20:03, 63F
推
10/12 20:05, , 64F
10/12 20:05, 64F
推
10/12 20:13, , 65F
10/12 20:13, 65F
→
10/12 20:14, , 66F
10/12 20:14, 66F
→
10/12 20:15, , 67F
10/12 20:15, 67F
→
10/12 20:16, , 68F
10/12 20:16, 68F
→
10/12 20:17, , 69F
10/12 20:17, 69F
推
10/12 20:17, , 70F
10/12 20:17, 70F
推
10/12 20:21, , 71F
10/12 20:21, 71F
→
10/12 20:21, , 72F
10/12 20:21, 72F
→
10/12 20:22, , 73F
10/12 20:22, 73F
→
10/12 20:23, , 74F
10/12 20:23, 74F
→
10/12 20:24, , 75F
10/12 20:24, 75F
推
10/12 20:28, , 76F
10/12 20:28, 76F
推
10/12 20:31, , 77F
10/12 20:31, 77F
推
10/12 20:34, , 78F
10/12 20:34, 78F
推
10/12 20:35, , 79F
10/12 20:35, 79F
推
10/12 20:36, , 80F
10/12 20:36, 80F
推
10/12 20:39, , 81F
10/12 20:39, 81F
→
10/12 20:39, , 82F
10/12 20:39, 82F
推
10/12 20:44, , 83F
10/12 20:44, 83F
→
10/12 20:44, , 84F
10/12 20:44, 84F
→
10/12 20:45, , 85F
10/12 20:45, 85F
推
10/12 20:47, , 86F
10/12 20:47, 86F
推
10/12 21:54, , 87F
10/12 21:54, 87F
→
10/12 21:54, , 88F
10/12 21:54, 88F
→
10/12 21:55, , 89F
10/12 21:55, 89F
→
10/12 21:59, , 90F
10/12 21:59, 90F
→
10/12 22:00, , 91F
10/12 22:00, 91F
推
10/12 22:55, , 92F
10/12 22:55, 92F
→
10/12 22:56, , 93F
10/12 22:56, 93F
推
10/12 22:58, , 94F
10/12 22:58, 94F
→
10/13 07:50, , 95F
10/13 07:50, 95F
推
10/13 09:33, , 96F
10/13 09:33, 96F
→
10/13 15:36, , 97F
10/13 15:36, 97F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文 (最舊先):
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 6 篇):