[討論] 為何那麼多人想要當聲優?已回收
大家都知道
聲優這行很競爭
收入也不是很高,甚至算低,一堆還要額外打工
那為啥還有一堆人想要當聲優?
你說對ACGN的愛?可是很多聲優也是對這些都不懂,沒接觸過
更甚者我想討厭ACGN的都有,討厭相關粉絲的我想應該也有
(日本討厭阿宅的很多,近幾年日本靠ACGN當日本外交軟實力才有比較好)
那為啥還有一堆人,假設不是因為愛,卻還要來這高競爭低收入成功機率極低的行業?
我先說我沒有要戰喔,理性討論
別看到負面議題就認為要來戰的
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 122.116.53.231
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1475920243.A.ACD.html
推
10/08 17:52, , 1F
10/08 17:52, 1F
推
10/08 17:52, , 2F
10/08 17:52, 2F
→
10/08 17:52, , 3F
10/08 17:52, 3F
→
10/08 17:52, , 4F
10/08 17:52, 4F
全部都為了愛那才奇怪,我是覺得喔,不要在這種小細節很認真,會沒辦法討論
以後啥討論都要拿資料出來,且不累死人?
→
10/08 17:52, , 5F
10/08 17:52, 5F
→
10/08 17:52, , 6F
10/08 17:52, 6F
推
10/08 17:53, , 7F
10/08 17:53, 7F
整天都在說聲優萬中選一,我是覺得喔不要整天在文字小細節這邊卡住
推
10/08 17:53, , 8F
10/08 17:53, 8F
→
10/08 17:53, , 9F
10/08 17:53, 9F
→
10/08 17:53, , 10F
10/08 17:53, 10F
推
10/08 17:53, , 11F
10/08 17:53, 11F
→
10/08 17:54, , 12F
10/08 17:54, 12F
推
10/08 17:55, , 13F
10/08 17:55, 13F
推
10/08 17:56, , 14F
10/08 17:56, 14F
→
10/08 17:57, , 15F
10/08 17:57, 15F
→
10/08 17:57, , 16F
10/08 17:57, 16F
→
10/08 17:57, , 17F
10/08 17:57, 17F
推
10/08 18:01, , 18F
10/08 18:01, 18F
推
10/08 18:01, , 19F
10/08 18:01, 19F
→
10/08 18:02, , 20F
10/08 18:02, 20F
→
10/08 18:03, , 21F
10/08 18:03, 21F
→
10/08 18:04, , 22F
10/08 18:04, 22F
推
10/08 18:06, , 23F
10/08 18:06, 23F
推
10/08 18:07, , 24F
10/08 18:07, 24F
推
10/08 18:09, , 25F
10/08 18:09, 25F
我大概懂了,我知道超多人想當演藝人員,大概就另一個管道另一種方式吧
推
10/08 18:12, , 26F
10/08 18:12, 26F
推
10/08 18:15, , 27F
10/08 18:15, 27F
推
10/08 18:16, , 28F
10/08 18:16, 28F
→
10/08 18:16, , 29F
10/08 18:16, 29F
這理由有點說服我了,有道理,簡單說就是拼運氣
推
10/08 18:16, , 30F
10/08 18:16, 30F
推
10/08 18:17, , 31F
10/08 18:17, 31F
推
10/08 18:20, , 32F
10/08 18:20, 32F
→
10/08 18:20, , 33F
10/08 18:20, 33F
→
10/08 18:21, , 34F
10/08 18:21, 34F
→
10/08 18:22, , 35F
10/08 18:22, 35F
→
10/08 18:23, , 36F
10/08 18:23, 36F
推
10/08 18:25, , 37F
10/08 18:25, 37F
因為CP高啊,有不錯的薪水又有生活品質
推
10/08 18:26, , 38F
10/08 18:26, 38F
推
10/08 18:28, , 39F
10/08 18:28, 39F
→
10/08 18:29, , 40F
10/08 18:29, 40F
※ 編輯: ptt987654321 (122.116.53.231), 10/08/2016 18:39:12
推
10/08 18:40, , 41F
10/08 18:40, 41F
推
10/08 18:44, , 42F
10/08 18:44, 42F
→
10/08 18:46, , 43F
10/08 18:46, 43F
→
10/08 18:49, , 44F
10/08 18:49, 44F
→
10/08 18:50, , 45F
10/08 18:50, 45F
推
10/08 18:57, , 46F
10/08 18:57, 46F
→
10/08 18:57, , 47F
10/08 18:57, 47F
→
10/08 18:57, , 48F
10/08 18:57, 48F
把針對我一個小小的鄉民的力氣拿來討論議題我是認為會比較好
→
10/08 19:02, , 49F
10/08 19:02, 49F
推
10/08 19:06, , 50F
10/08 19:06, 50F
→
10/08 19:07, , 51F
10/08 19:07, 51F
推
10/08 19:11, , 52F
10/08 19:11, 52F
→
10/08 19:29, , 53F
10/08 19:29, 53F
→
10/08 19:29, , 54F
10/08 19:29, 54F
→
10/08 19:31, , 55F
10/08 19:31, 55F
推
10/08 19:35, , 56F
10/08 19:35, 56F
推
10/08 19:50, , 57F
10/08 19:50, 57F
推
10/08 20:08, , 58F
10/08 20:08, 58F
→
10/08 20:08, , 59F
10/08 20:08, 59F
→
10/08 20:09, , 60F
10/08 20:09, 60F
→
10/08 20:11, , 61F
10/08 20:11, 61F
→
10/08 20:12, , 62F
10/08 20:12, 62F
→
10/08 20:12, , 63F
10/08 20:12, 63F
我覺得你的回答最好,就是賭那個可能性
→
10/08 20:34, , 64F
10/08 20:34, 64F
→
10/08 20:34, , 65F
10/08 20:34, 65F
→
10/08 20:46, , 66F
10/08 20:46, 66F
→
10/08 23:12, , 67F
10/08 23:12, 67F
→
10/08 23:12, , 68F
10/08 23:12, 68F
→
10/08 23:13, , 69F
10/08 23:13, 69F
→
10/08 23:13, , 70F
10/08 23:13, 70F
→
10/08 23:14, , 71F
10/08 23:14, 71F
→
10/08 23:14, , 72F
10/08 23:14, 72F
→
10/08 23:15, , 73F
10/08 23:15, 73F
→
10/08 23:15, , 74F
10/08 23:15, 74F
→
10/08 23:16, , 75F
10/08 23:16, 75F
※ 編輯: ptt987654321 (122.116.53.231), 10/09/2016 01:33:40
討論串 (同標題文章)