[討論] 畫技好的漫畫家,是否什麼題材都有基本盤?已回收
看板C_Chat作者Emerson158 (紅豆 X 八嘎 X 烏魯賽)時間9年前 (2016/09/18 13:47)推噓22(22推 0噓 30→)留言52則, 36人參與討論串1/3 (看更多)
先說所謂基本盤,這裡就是指讀者支持度
漫畫這種刊物,FANS向很重,而且感覺來的快去得快 這說不定是圖文書的特徵
舉幾個漫畫家例子:
北条司
第1個就是鬼神精細級的例子...,天使心的劇情比前一部軟很多,但是之前的棒球父女篇
讓我覺得他畫棒球漫畫,也是有搞頭
=
冨樫義博
第2個根本是前一個的精細對比XDD||,但是新手我都看得出冨樫的分鏡功力之高
不用文字旁白就能說故事
各種題材都能發揮
=
小畑健
很吃劇情,劇情好的每一部大受期待,劇情不好的跟叶恭弘有得比ww
=
井上雄彥
我不知道他現在算不算漫畫家,不過很難會有人質疑灌籃高手的流暢吧
劍客也描繪得很強,雖然武藏根本長得像櫻木
好像畫技強,作品基本都能發揮,是真的嗎?
PS. 想看北条司畫的心愛或32y麻美(眼神死)
--
作者 Skyblade (天劍家的女兒無與倫比) 站內 C_Chat
標題 [閒聊] 你會最先注意異性角色的哪裡?
時間 Thu Feb 5 21:49:08 2015
推
02/05 22:03,
02/05 22:03
推
02/05 22:05,
02/05 22:05
推
02/05 22:07,
02/05 22:07
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 36.227.115.249
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1474177640.A.BE9.html
推
09/18 13:48, , 1F
09/18 13:48, 1F
推
09/18 13:48, , 2F
09/18 13:48, 2F
→
09/18 13:49, , 3F
09/18 13:49, 3F
→
09/18 13:49, , 4F
09/18 13:49, 4F
→
09/18 13:50, , 5F
09/18 13:50, 5F
→
09/18 13:52, , 6F
09/18 13:52, 6F
推
09/18 13:53, , 7F
09/18 13:53, 7F
推
09/18 13:53, , 8F
09/18 13:53, 8F
→
09/18 13:53, , 9F
09/18 13:53, 9F
推
09/18 13:54, , 10F
09/18 13:54, 10F
推
09/18 13:59, , 11F
09/18 13:59, 11F
推
09/18 13:59, , 12F
09/18 13:59, 12F
→
09/18 14:00, , 13F
09/18 14:00, 13F
→
09/18 14:00, , 14F
09/18 14:00, 14F
→
09/18 14:00, , 15F
09/18 14:00, 15F
推
09/18 14:02, , 16F
09/18 14:02, 16F
→
09/18 14:03, , 17F
09/18 14:03, 17F
推
09/18 14:04, , 18F
09/18 14:04, 18F
→
09/18 14:04, , 19F
09/18 14:04, 19F
推
09/18 14:04, , 20F
09/18 14:04, 20F
→
09/18 14:05, , 21F
09/18 14:05, 21F
→
09/18 14:05, , 22F
09/18 14:05, 22F
→
09/18 14:06, , 23F
09/18 14:06, 23F
→
09/18 14:07, , 24F
09/18 14:07, 24F
→
09/18 14:09, , 25F
09/18 14:09, 25F
推
09/18 14:09, , 26F
09/18 14:09, 26F
→
09/18 14:09, , 27F
09/18 14:09, 27F
→
09/18 14:09, , 28F
09/18 14:09, 28F
→
09/18 14:10, , 29F
09/18 14:10, 29F
推
09/18 14:17, , 30F
09/18 14:17, 30F
推
09/18 14:40, , 31F
09/18 14:40, 31F
推
09/18 14:44, , 32F
09/18 14:44, 32F
→
09/18 14:47, , 33F
09/18 14:47, 33F
→
09/18 14:53, , 34F
09/18 14:53, 34F
→
09/18 14:54, , 35F
09/18 14:54, 35F
推
09/18 14:54, , 36F
09/18 14:54, 36F
→
09/18 15:04, , 37F
09/18 15:04, 37F
推
09/18 15:17, , 38F
09/18 15:17, 38F
→
09/18 15:17, , 39F
09/18 15:17, 39F
→
09/18 15:43, , 40F
09/18 15:43, 40F
推
09/18 15:55, , 41F
09/18 15:55, 41F
→
09/18 15:55, , 42F
09/18 15:55, 42F
→
09/18 15:55, , 43F
09/18 15:55, 43F
推
09/18 15:56, , 44F
09/18 15:56, 44F
→
09/18 15:56, , 45F
09/18 15:56, 45F
→
09/18 15:57, , 46F
09/18 15:57, 46F
→
09/18 17:58, , 47F
09/18 17:58, 47F
推
09/18 18:04, , 48F
09/18 18:04, 48F
→
09/18 18:04, , 49F
09/18 18:04, 49F
推
09/18 18:18, , 50F
09/18 18:18, 50F
推
09/18 22:41, , 51F
09/18 22:41, 51F
推
09/19 05:00, , 52F
09/19 05:00, 52F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 3 篇):