[討論] 哪些作品有把說教橋段完美融入劇情的?已回收
所謂「說教」不是說跟敵人互打「有沒有夥伴與強弱之關係」這種嘴砲,而是作者能否將一種價值或理念透過人物對話直接傳達給觀眾
在看銀魂(前期)時都覺得好屌
為什麼這麼中二的臺詞可以這麼自然的放進對話裡
相比之下某魚人島,感覺像是為了演說才做出這段故事
巨人(漫畫)也挺厲害,「人得沉醉於某些事物上才撐得下去吧」這種彷彿Peter su廢文的話,前面加一小段後面加個一句配上咳嗽吐血和吃力的動作,哇靠感覺好發人深省
獵人是完全不同的境界,腳色每句話都經過琢磨,幾乎沒過違和感
死亡筆記這種被迫說教的則是別的問題
還有什麼作品說教很屌?
拜託別提死神
-----
Sent from JPTT on my Samsung SM-N9208.
--
http://i.imgur.com/vT9YDoB.jpg

我們家東立真的很棒
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 114.136.204.29
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1473392558.A.F27.html
推
09/09 11:43, , 1F
09/09 11:43, 1F
推
09/09 11:44, , 2F
09/09 11:44, 2F
推
09/09 11:44, , 3F
09/09 11:44, 3F
推
09/09 11:46, , 4F
09/09 11:46, 4F
推
09/09 11:46, , 5F
09/09 11:46, 5F
→
09/09 11:46, , 6F
09/09 11:46, 6F
→
09/09 11:47, , 7F
09/09 11:47, 7F
推
09/09 11:47, , 8F
09/09 11:47, 8F
→
09/09 11:47, , 9F
09/09 11:47, 9F
推
09/09 11:48, , 10F
09/09 11:48, 10F
推
09/09 11:48, , 11F
09/09 11:48, 11F
推
09/09 11:48, , 12F
09/09 11:48, 12F
→
09/09 11:48, , 13F
09/09 11:48, 13F
→
09/09 11:49, , 14F
09/09 11:49, 14F
推
09/09 11:49, , 15F
09/09 11:49, 15F
推
09/09 11:52, , 16F
09/09 11:52, 16F
→
09/09 11:53, , 17F
09/09 11:53, 17F
推
09/09 11:54, , 18F
09/09 11:54, 18F
推
09/09 11:55, , 19F
09/09 11:55, 19F
推
09/09 11:58, , 20F
09/09 11:58, 20F
推
09/09 11:59, , 21F
09/09 11:59, 21F
推
09/09 12:00, , 22F
09/09 12:00, 22F
推
09/09 12:00, , 23F
09/09 12:00, 23F
推
09/09 12:00, , 24F
09/09 12:00, 24F
推
09/09 12:01, , 25F
09/09 12:01, 25F

推
09/09 12:02, , 26F
09/09 12:02, 26F
推
09/09 12:03, , 27F
09/09 12:03, 27F
推
09/09 12:03, , 28F
09/09 12:03, 28F
→
09/09 12:05, , 29F
09/09 12:05, 29F
推
09/09 12:06, , 30F
09/09 12:06, 30F
→
09/09 12:10, , 31F
09/09 12:10, 31F
→
09/09 12:10, , 32F
09/09 12:10, 32F
推
09/09 12:12, , 33F
09/09 12:12, 33F
推
09/09 12:13, , 34F
09/09 12:13, 34F
→
09/09 12:15, , 35F
09/09 12:15, 35F
推
09/09 12:15, , 36F
09/09 12:15, 36F
推
09/09 12:17, , 37F
09/09 12:17, 37F
推
09/09 12:20, , 38F
09/09 12:20, 38F
推
09/09 12:21, , 39F
09/09 12:21, 39F
→
09/09 12:21, , 40F
09/09 12:21, 40F
→
09/09 12:21, , 41F
09/09 12:21, 41F
→
09/09 12:21, , 42F
09/09 12:21, 42F
→
09/09 12:22, , 43F
09/09 12:22, 43F
→
09/09 12:22, , 44F
09/09 12:22, 44F
推
09/09 12:23, , 45F
09/09 12:23, 45F
推
09/09 12:24, , 46F
09/09 12:24, 46F
推
09/09 12:26, , 47F
09/09 12:26, 47F
→
09/09 12:27, , 48F
09/09 12:27, 48F
推
09/09 12:30, , 49F
09/09 12:30, 49F
推
09/09 12:31, , 50F
09/09 12:31, 50F
推
09/09 12:38, , 51F
09/09 12:38, 51F
→
09/09 12:39, , 52F
09/09 12:39, 52F
推
09/09 12:40, , 53F
09/09 12:40, 53F
推
09/09 12:42, , 54F
09/09 12:42, 54F
→
09/09 12:42, , 55F
09/09 12:42, 55F
推
09/09 12:42, , 56F
09/09 12:42, 56F
→
09/09 12:48, , 57F
09/09 12:48, 57F
→
09/09 12:48, , 58F
09/09 12:48, 58F
推
09/09 12:50, , 59F
09/09 12:50, 59F
→
09/09 12:59, , 60F
09/09 12:59, 60F
推
09/09 13:08, , 61F
09/09 13:08, 61F
推
09/09 13:10, , 62F
09/09 13:10, 62F
推
09/09 13:24, , 63F
09/09 13:24, 63F
推
09/09 13:37, , 64F
09/09 13:37, 64F
推
09/09 13:41, , 65F
09/09 13:41, 65F
推
09/09 13:48, , 66F
09/09 13:48, 66F
推
09/09 13:58, , 67F
09/09 13:58, 67F
推
09/09 14:01, , 68F
09/09 14:01, 68F
推
09/09 14:03, , 69F
09/09 14:03, 69F
推
09/09 14:21, , 70F
09/09 14:21, 70F
推
09/09 14:23, , 71F
09/09 14:23, 71F
推
09/09 14:26, , 72F
09/09 14:26, 72F
推
09/09 14:38, , 73F
09/09 14:38, 73F
→
09/09 14:39, , 74F
09/09 14:39, 74F
推
09/09 14:44, , 75F
09/09 14:44, 75F
推
09/09 15:12, , 76F
09/09 15:12, 76F
推
09/09 15:18, , 77F
09/09 15:18, 77F
推
09/09 15:36, , 78F
09/09 15:36, 78F
→
09/09 15:53, , 79F
09/09 15:53, 79F
推
09/09 16:11, , 80F
09/09 16:11, 80F
推
09/09 16:28, , 81F
09/09 16:28, 81F
推
09/09 16:46, , 82F
09/09 16:46, 82F
推
09/09 16:53, , 83F
09/09 16:53, 83F
推
09/09 17:16, , 84F
09/09 17:16, 84F
推
09/09 17:30, , 85F
09/09 17:30, 85F
推
09/09 17:41, , 86F
09/09 17:41, 86F
→
09/09 17:53, , 87F
09/09 17:53, 87F
推
09/09 18:27, , 88F
09/09 18:27, 88F
→
09/09 18:27, , 89F
09/09 18:27, 89F
推
09/09 19:12, , 90F
09/09 19:12, 90F
推
09/09 19:14, , 91F
09/09 19:14, 91F
推
09/10 02:27, , 92F
09/10 02:27, 92F
討論串 (同標題文章)
以下文章回應了本文:
完整討論串 (本文為第 1 之 2 篇):