[閒聊] 境界的彼方被低估了嗎?已回收
看完本季新番某集後突然覺得
差不多的主題 同樣的動畫公司
境界的彼方是不是被低估了呢?
雖然大家都說本體是第六集 問100個人
搞不好101人說第六集經典 其他都忘了
可是人家好歹有個無關痛癢 無足輕重的主軸
境界的彼方
配上有點奇怪的男女愛情故事 結局也有硬凹之嫌
就算如此 前面多少也有劇情高潮迭起之處
男女主角感情真摯又老套(奇怪的組合)
但應該不是只有第六集的平凡作
到底是第六集太優秀喧賓奪主 還是 其他集沒有亮點?
其實我是覺得被低估了
--
※ 發信站: 批踢踢實業坊(ptt.cc), 來自: 1.161.30.120
※ 文章網址: https://www.ptt.cc/bbs/C_Chat/M.1455248681.A.057.html
推
02/12 11:45, , 1F
02/12 11:45, 1F
→
02/12 11:46, , 2F
02/12 11:46, 2F
→
02/12 11:48, , 3F
02/12 11:48, 3F
等等 一開頭暗示的還不夠明顯嗎 怎麼會得出無彩限很好看的結論啊?
推
02/12 11:49, , 4F
02/12 11:49, 4F
推
02/12 11:49, , 5F
02/12 11:49, 5F
※ 編輯: yang0623 (1.161.30.120), 02/12/2016 11:51:50
推
02/12 11:50, , 6F
02/12 11:50, 6F
推
02/12 11:50, , 7F
02/12 11:50, 7F
推
02/12 11:51, , 8F
02/12 11:51, 8F
推
02/12 11:52, , 9F
02/12 11:52, 9F
→
02/12 11:52, , 10F
02/12 11:52, 10F
推
02/12 11:52, , 11F
02/12 11:52, 11F
→
02/12 11:55, , 12F
02/12 11:55, 12F
講白了 無彩限第六集讓人覺得:啊 原來境界彼方也不會難看XDDD 這是一種比爛的概念
推
02/12 11:55, , 13F
02/12 11:55, 13F
※ 編輯: yang0623 (1.161.30.120), 02/12/2016 11:57:18
→
02/12 11:55, , 14F
02/12 11:55, 14F
推
02/12 11:57, , 15F
02/12 11:57, 15F
推
02/12 11:58, , 16F
02/12 11:58, 16F
那有什麼關係? 有些事情不用講太白不是嗎?
※ 編輯: yang0623 (1.161.30.120), 02/12/2016 11:59:45
推
02/12 11:59, , 17F
02/12 11:59, 17F
推
02/12 11:59, , 18F
02/12 11:59, 18F
推
02/12 12:00, , 19F
02/12 12:00, 19F
→
02/12 12:00, , 20F
02/12 12:00, 20F
→
02/12 12:00, , 21F
02/12 12:00, 21F
→
02/12 12:05, , 22F
02/12 12:05, 22F
不算系列文啦 只是閒聊
※ 編輯: yang0623 (1.161.30.120), 02/12/2016 12:06:44
→
02/12 12:07, , 23F
02/12 12:07, 23F
→
02/12 12:08, , 24F
02/12 12:08, 24F
→
02/12 12:10, , 25F
02/12 12:10, 25F
推
02/12 12:13, , 26F
02/12 12:13, 26F
推
02/12 12:14, , 27F
02/12 12:14, 27F
→
02/12 12:14, , 28F
02/12 12:14, 28F
推
02/12 12:15, , 29F
02/12 12:15, 29F
→
02/12 12:15, , 30F
02/12 12:15, 30F
→
02/12 12:18, , 31F
02/12 12:18, 31F
推
02/12 12:24, , 32F
02/12 12:24, 32F
→
02/12 12:26, , 33F
02/12 12:26, 33F
→
02/12 12:29, , 34F
02/12 12:29, 34F
→
02/12 12:29, , 35F
02/12 12:29, 35F
→
02/12 12:29, , 36F
02/12 12:29, 36F
推
02/12 12:30, , 37F
02/12 12:30, 37F
→
02/12 12:30, , 38F
02/12 12:30, 38F
→
02/12 12:36, , 39F
02/12 12:36, 39F
推
02/12 12:36, , 40F
02/12 12:36, 40F
推
02/12 12:44, , 41F
02/12 12:44, 41F
推
02/12 12:46, , 42F
02/12 12:46, 42F
→
02/12 12:46, , 43F
02/12 12:46, 43F
推
02/12 12:55, , 44F
02/12 12:55, 44F
→
02/12 12:58, , 45F
02/12 12:58, 45F
推
02/12 13:10, , 46F
02/12 13:10, 46F
推
02/12 13:39, , 47F
02/12 13:39, 47F
→
02/12 13:39, , 48F
02/12 13:39, 48F
→
02/12 13:39, , 49F
02/12 13:39, 49F
→
02/12 13:39, , 50F
02/12 13:39, 50F
→
02/12 13:39, , 51F
02/12 13:39, 51F
→
02/12 13:39, , 52F
02/12 13:39, 52F
→
02/12 13:39, , 53F
02/12 13:39, 53F
推
02/12 13:42, , 54F
02/12 13:42, 54F
→
02/12 13:42, , 55F
02/12 13:42, 55F
推
02/12 13:49, , 56F
02/12 13:49, 56F
→
02/12 13:57, , 57F
02/12 13:57, 57F
推
02/12 14:28, , 58F
02/12 14:28, 58F
推
02/12 14:33, , 59F
02/12 14:33, 59F
→
02/12 14:36, , 60F
02/12 14:36, 60F
推
02/12 15:18, , 61F
02/12 15:18, 61F
推
02/12 15:46, , 62F
02/12 15:46, 62F
→
02/12 15:46, , 63F
02/12 15:46, 63F
→
02/12 15:46, , 64F
02/12 15:46, 64F
→
02/12 15:46, , 65F
02/12 15:46, 65F
→
02/12 15:46, , 66F
02/12 15:46, 66F
→
02/12 15:46, , 67F
02/12 15:46, 67F
推
02/12 15:49, , 68F
02/12 15:49, 68F
→
02/12 15:49, , 69F
02/12 15:49, 69F
→
02/12 15:58, , 70F
02/12 15:58, 70F
→
02/12 15:59, , 71F
02/12 15:59, 71F
推
02/12 18:40, , 72F
02/12 18:40, 72F
推
02/12 21:01, , 73F
02/12 21:01, 73F
推
02/12 21:03, , 74F
02/12 21:03, 74F
推
02/12 22:25, , 75F
02/12 22:25, 75F